ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Along the Spectrum from Reduction to Mastectomy: Comparing the Opinions of an Online Transmasculine and Gender-Diverse Community on an Algorithmic Approach to Gender-Affirming Top Surgery.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender-affirming health care needs, barriers to care, and health and wellbeing in a broad nationwide sample of transgender people in Norway.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Safety and quality outcomes of same-day discharge for gender-affirming mastectomy during the pandemic.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGender-diverse patients often have unique preferences for top surgery that differ from those of binary transgender men. Yet, discussions around tailored surgical options remain limited. Social media platforms provide insights into the preferences of gender-diverse individuals who frequently turn to digital spaces for information and support. This study sought to explore the diverse needs of gender-diverse respondents and gather their feedback on a pictorial algorithm designed to assist with preoperative surgical decision-making.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was distributed on Reddit to individuals considering or having undergone masculinizing top surgery. The survey collected data on aesthetic preferences, comfort with surgical options, surgeon communication, and the need for non-standard surgical choices. A pictorial algorithm was used to evaluate its utility in enhancing preoperative discussions. Data were analyzed for demographic differences and preferences across transgender male, non-binary, and other gender-diverse (OGD) groups.
resultsOf 799 respondents, 639 met the inclusion criteria. Non-binary and OGD respondents were older (p<0.0001) and had higher education levels (p<0.0001). These groups showed a higher preference for "non-standard" chest reconstruction (p=0.02), were less likely to want nipple-areola complex (NAC) reconstruction, and reported more frequent interactions where they educated their surgeons on options (p<0.0001) and greater comfort in these discussions (p=0.0002).
conclusionThis study highlights the diverse preferences and needs of gender-diverse individuals seeking masculinizing top surgery. It underscores the importance of personalized care, with a structured communication tool and algorithm aiding better patient-provider alignment for more tailored surgical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40295366What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.