ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025
Repeated stereotactic radiosurgery for residual intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endovascular embolization of dural arteriovenous fistulas: an 8-year single-centre experience and comparison with contemporary literature.Polish journal of radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is widely used for the treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs); however, the outcomes of repeated SRS to deal with residual DAVFs are unclear. This study assessed the benefits and potential negative consequences of repeated SRS in patients with residual DAVFs.
methodsThis retrospective study examined all patients who underwent two SRS procedures for DAVFs in a single academic medical center between January 1998 and December 2022. Information related to patient demography, DAVFs characteristics, and clinical outcomes were obtained from medical records. The objective in this study was to obtain a preliminary overview of the results of repeated SRS for DAVFs.
resultsThe study cohort of 19 patients included 14 patients with non-cavernous sinus (NCS) DAVFs and 5 patients with cavernous sinus (CS) DAVFs. The NCS group included 8 patients who were categorized as low-grade (Borden grade 1) and 6 as high-grade (Borden grade 2 or 3). The median follow up duration after the second session of SRS was 37 months. Symptomatic improvement was noted in 16 patients (84.2%) and total obliteration was identified in 11 patients (57.9%). No patient suffered from intracranial hemorrhage after the repeated SRS. One patient (5.3%) experienced symptomatic radiation-induced change mandating temporary course of medical treatment.
conclusionsRepeated SRS appears to be a safe and effective approach to deal with residual DAVFs, resulting in symptomatic improvement and complete radiologic obliteration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.