Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40295350›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025

Rise of Asian research in orthopaedic and sports medicine: a bibliometric analysis from 1996 to 2022.

Sravya Teja Paleti, Srinivas B S Kambhampati, Abhishek Vaish, Raju Vaishya, Riccardo D'Ambrosi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Global evolution of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis research (1990-2025): a bibliometric and visualization analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sravya Teja PaletiAlluri SitaRama Raju Academy of Medical Sciences, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Srinivas B S KambhampatiSri Dhaatri Orthopaedic, Maternity & Gynaecology Center, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Abhishek VaishIndraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
Raju VaishyaIndraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
Riccardo D'AmbrosiIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. riccardo.dambrosi@hotmail.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examines the growth and impact of orthopaedic and sports medicine (OSM) publications across 30 Asian countries from 1996 to 2022 using a bibliometric (scientometric) approach. Despite Asia's rising academic achievements, prior studies have not comprehensively mapped publication trends in this field across the region. This analysis aims to perform bibliometric analysis in OSM research in the Asian Countries.

methodsPublication data were sourced from the SCImago Journal & Country Rank portal, derived from the SCOPUS database, covering the period from 1996 to 2022, with updates available until April 2023. The analysis focused on the top Asian countries and included key indicators such as H-index and total citations to assess research impact.

resultsThe study identified a substantial rise in OSM publications from Asia, with total output increasing 14.27-fold-compared to a 5.54-fold increase globally. Between 1996 and 2022, 111,342 OSM publications originated from Asian countries, out of 666,847 globally. However, citation counts for Asian research declined from 26,263 in 1996 to 6020 in 2022, likely reflecting the time-lag effect in citation accumulation for recent publications. Possible contributing factors are discussed.

conclusionThis study highlights a remarkable surge in orthopaedic and sports medicine publications from Asia, surpassing global growth trends. While citation metrics appear lower in recent years-likely due to the recency of publications-the overall trend suggests a strong and growing research in Asia. China and Japan lead in output and impact, respectively, while India's rapid rise reflects increasing academic potential. However, enhancing research quality and visibility and reducing self-citation are essential to elevate global impact. Countries like Hong Kong, Singapore, and Sri Lanka demonstrate high citation efficiency. With optimal collaboration and strategic investment, Asian countries are well positioned to play a leading role in global orthopaedic research.

Indexed as

BibliometricsBiomedical ResearchOrthopedicsSports MedicineAsiaHumansAsiaBibliometricsOrthopaedicsResearchSports medicine

Identifiers

PMID40295350
PMCPMC12037662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.