ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Primary imaging diagnostics of lymphomas].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the rectus abdominis muscle: a presumed primary case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Lymphedema is a rare manifestation of lymphoma: A case series and literature review.Oncology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical/methodological issueImaging procedures are an integral component of the diagnostics and treatment of lymphomas for the initial diagnosis, staging and assessment of the efficacy of treatment. The different lymphoma entities show differences in metabolic activity and therefore require different examination modalities. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsThis review article focuses on the primary imaging diagnostics of lymphomas using computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It also discusses the special imaging features of the various subtypes. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: The potential of whole-body (WB) MRI, PET/MRI and other PET tracers are discussed. PERFORMANCE: In addition, the most important classifications for the diagnosis of spread and diagnostic scores based on imaging are explained and important pitfalls in initial imaging are discussed. ASSESSMENT: Besides these most frequently used modalities, WB MRI and PET/MRI offer alternatives for special patient groups (e.g., children and pregnant women). PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Imaging in the initial diagnosis of lymphomas should generally include an examination of the neck, thorax, abdomen, pelvis and inguinal region. Depending on the lymphoma entity, imaging is often performed using PET/CT or CT. Standardized staging classifications are used for many lymphoma entities but there are adapted criteria for several subtypes that should be taken into consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40295348What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.