ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Modified Arteriovenous Loop Technique for Successful Antegrade Device Closure of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defects with Aortic Valve Prolapse-A Single-Center Experience.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In ventricular septal defects (VSDs) close to aortic valve, mostly surgical closure is preferred. Currently, transcatheter method of device closure is done in selective cases with satisfactory results. Perimembranous with outflow extension VSDs having mild aortic valve prolapse with trivial to mild aortic regurgitation (AR) were selected. VSD devices were deployed through antegrade route with our modification of standard arteriovenous (A-V) loop technique to prevent aortic valve compression and progression of AR. Among 55 cases of perimembranous VSDs having outlet extension with aortic valve prolapse, 44 (80%) cases had successful closure with our modified technique and 11 (20%) underwent surgical closure as device closure was not amenable. At 1 year follow-up, the VSD closure rate was 91% with trivial and mild AR persisting in 24.4% and 5% of cases, respectively. Satisfactory closure of VSDs close to aortic valve is possible with our modified A-V loop technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40295344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.