Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40295322›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2025

Relevance of kinetic interactions and co-formulants for plant protection product liver toxicity in vitro.

Yemurai Musengi, Ilinca Suciu, Tewes Tralau, Denise Bloch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yemurai MusengiDepartment of Pesticides Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Straße 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany. Yemurai.Musengi@bfr.bund.de.ORCID 0009-0003-9780-870X
Ilinca SuciuDepartment of Pesticides Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Straße 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8166-9982
Tewes TralauGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Straße 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7857-4237
Denise BlochDepartment of Pesticides Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Straße 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1222-9668

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant protection product (PPP) risk assessment predominantly focuses on the active substances, at least with respect to the regulatory data requirements. The reason is that for threshold values for the ready-to-use formulations one would need significantly more animal data. Given the high number of formulations, this is not a realistic option, be it for capacity, cost, or animal welfare. Thus, any extension of the data for evaluating formulations should ideally first make maximum use of other approaches. Using an adverse outcome pathway (AOP)-guided approach, we, therefore, investigated the potential mixture effects of two active substances (difenoconazole and mandipropamid) by focusing on the qualitative and quantitative toxicokinetic effects on metabolism. Since difenoconazole is a potential liver steatogen, cytotoxicity and liver triglyceride accumulation in HepaRG cells were used as primary endpoints. In addition, transcriptomics and biochemical analyses were conducted to investigate potential effects on gene expression and inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. CA was observed for cytotoxicity of the formulated product-equivalent active substance mixture (1:1); the mixture with a higher concentration of the CYP3A4 inhibitor demonstrated a more than additive effect. Furthermore, modulation of the expression and activity of CYP and steatosis-related nuclear receptors, such as PXR, AhR, and CAR, was observed in the mixtures and the formulated product. Overall, the findings highlight that toxicokinetic interactions between active substances play a vital role in PPP mixture effects and that co-formulants also contribute to this effect. Moreover, this study demonstrates that more than additive effects from kinetic interaction require the enhancer to be within the concentration ranges that potentially saturate CYP enzyme activity. In conclusion, the current findings suggest that a comprehensive PPP risk assessment must consider additive effects between active substances as well as the contribution of co-formulants to adverse effects.

Indexed as

Chemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryDioxolanesLiverTriazolesAdverse Outcome PathwaysCell LineHumansRisk AssessmentToxicokineticsdifenoconazoleDioxolanesTriazolesCYP enzymesKinetic interactionsLiver steatosisMixture effectsNew approach methodologies (NAMs)Plant protection products risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID40295322
PMCPMC12367838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.