Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40295222›Full record

ArticleChild: care, health and development2025

Parenting in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Study.

Gizem Kerimoglu Yildiz, Selda Ates Besirik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child: care, health and development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring hope in parents of infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit: a cross-sectional study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Gadamerian Hermeneutic Philosophy and Caring Science.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gizem Kerimoglu YildizDepartment of Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6850-7233
Selda Ates BesirikDepartment of Pediatric Nursing, Bucak School of Health, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0744-3213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis qualitative study is aimed at describing parental feelings, their readiness during discharge, and their needs while their infant is in the neonatal intensive care unit.

methodsThe study was conducted with the parents of infants being monitored in a neonatal intensive care unit. A total of 30 in-depth interviews were conducted with 15 parents. This qualitative study was carried out using the Gadamerian-based research method. After parents were informed about the study, written and verbal consent was obtained from them.

resultsThe content analysis of the interview data resulted in six themes: 'sense of trust and cocoon effect, anxiety and conflicting emotions, parent-infant bonding and breastfeeding, fear of providing care, readiness/unreadiness and support needs and recommendations'.

conclusionParents often feel anxious and fearful about harming their vulnerable infants, with added stress surrounding their ability to provide care and the discharge process.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalParentingParentsAdultAnxietyBreast FeedingFearFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleObject AttachmentParent-Child RelationsPatient DischargeQualitative ResearchTrustfathermotherneonatal intensive care unitparentingpreterm infantreadiness

Identifiers

PMID40295222
PMCPMC12037445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.