ReviewClinical & experimental ophthalmology2025
Presbyopia Correction in Lens Replacement Surgery: A Review.
Review in Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Visual Outcomes After Mix-and-Match Implantation of Trifocal and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Diffractive intraocular lenses reshape 577-nm retinal laser photocoagulation spots in a model eye.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Premium Intraocular Lens Implantation After Laser Vision Correction: An Updated Narrative Review of Biometry, IOL Selection, Visual Outcomes, and Clinical Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A Comparative Study of the Visual Outcomes of Two Common Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lenses in a Matched Cohort.Cureus · 2026Article
- Visual and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of Two Enhanced Monofocal IOLs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Analysis of visual quality after implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lens Diff - aA in cataract patients.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of the First Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Literature Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Association between systemic immune-inflammation index and postoperative optical quality in the early recovery phase after cataract surgery: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Performance of an Isofocal Toric Intraocular Lens with Double C-Loop Haptics: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Nd:YAG Capsulotomy Rates of Three FineVision Trifocal Intraocular Lens Platform Across Different Platforms: Results from a Multicenter Clinical Registry Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Comparison of Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction Between Two Trifocal Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective, Paired-Eye Comparative Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Refractive Surprises After Cataract Surgery: Identification and Management in Optometric Practice- A Comprehensive Review.Clinical optometry · 2026Review
- Using Large Language Models for In Silico Development and Simulation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire for Cataract Surgery with Various Intraocular Lenses: A Pre-Validation Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Current Trends in Presbyopia Correction-A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Real-World Visual and Refractive Results of Two Different Presbyopia Correcting Intraocular Lenses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction with Extended Monovision-An Innovative Strategy to Achieve Spectacle Independence in Refractive Lens Exchange.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Presbyopia Correction in Lens Replacement Surgery: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Presbyopia affects approximately 1.8 billion individuals globally, posing significant challenges as life expectancy and near-vision demands, particularly with mobile phone use, grow. Addressing presbyopia during lens replacement surgery has become a key focus for cataract surgeons, aiming to reduce dependence on corrective eyewear. This review provides an overview of current intraocular lens (IOL) technologies and surgical strategies for presbyopia correction. Personalised decision-making is essential, considering each patient's visual needs, expectations, and ocular anatomy. Partial correction approaches, such as monovision and extended depth-of-focus IOLs, can improve intermediate vision but involve specific trade-offs compared to monofocal lenses, depending on the technology utilised. For complete presbyopia correction, multifocal IOLs remain the most effective option. A mix-and-match strategy involving unilateral multifocal implantation shows promise, while sulcus-fixated supplementary IOLs offer the advantage of easier reversibility. Careful IOL selection is particularly important for patients with atypical ocular anatomy or coexisting conditions, which may be progressive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.