Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40295133›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Factors contributing to the implementation of interventions to prevent and manage intensive care unit delirium: a systematic review protocol.

Burak Kundakci, Katherine Louise Jones, Andrew Booth, Roxanne M Parslow, Andrew J Moore, Ben Gibbison, Maria Pufulete

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Burak KundakciSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3507-1111
Katherine Louise JonesSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5166-6462
Andrew BoothSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-3880
Roxanne M ParslowSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3612-7121
Andrew J MooreTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Southmead, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3185-1599
Ben GibbisonTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Southmead, Bristol, UK ben.gibbison@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3635-6212
Maria PufuleteUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1775-1949

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDelirium is a common and serious condition that frequently affects patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). It is characterised by an acute disturbance in cognition, attention and awareness that develops over a short period of time and tends to fluctuate in severity. Patients with ICU delirium (ICUD) may experience confusion, disorientation, difficulty focusing and perceptual disturbances such as hallucinations or delusions. The prevalence of ICUD is high, with estimates suggesting that it can affect up to 70% of ICU patients. The development of ICUD is associated with several adverse outcomes, including prolonged ICU and hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, higher mortality rates and an increased risk of long-term cognitive impairment, including dementia. It is unclear which components should be included in a complex intervention to prevent and manage ICUD. Furthermore, we need to understand how the different components have been implemented and their impact on clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and the enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research (ENTREQ) reporting recommendations. We will perform systematic searches to identify relevant interventions and implementation strategies for the prevention or management of ICUD. We will assess primary research, service evaluations and audits for the use of the Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) as a checklist for quality improvement in healthcare. We will extract both qualitative and quantitative data and assess study quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Our findings will be synthesised using a best-fit framework synthesis mapped against the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Our Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) group will contribute to the development of review processes such as the research question and methodology and will help to evaluate which outcomes are most important. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for this study. The results of this systematic review of implementation strategies will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conferences. They will also form part of an evidence map and logic model for factors that can improve the implementation of strategies for prevention, identification and management of ICUD. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024537313.

Indexed as

Critical CareDeliriumIntensive Care UnitsHumansResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicDeliriumImplementation ScienceIntensive Care Units

Identifiers

PMID40295133
PMCPMC12039013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.