ArticleBMJ open2025
Patient satisfaction and its associated factors in selected primary healthcare facilities in Kono District, Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of Patient Satisfaction With Primary Health Care Among the Rural Community People: A Cross-Sectional Evidence From Khulna Division, Bangladesh.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Exploring the Effect of Doctor-Nurse Collaboration on Overall Satisfaction Among the Older Patients: A Moderated Mediation Model of Responsiveness and Environment.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Opportunities for improvement of community-based non-communicable disease screening practices in Indonesia: a participant satisfaction survey.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Exploring Patient Satisfaction and Determinants in VIP Outpatient: A SERVQUAL-Based Latent Class Analysis.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess patient satisfaction (PS) with services and its associated factors across selected primary care facilities in Kono district, Sierra Leone.
designFacility-based cross-sectional study.
settingFive primary healthcare facilities (Wellbody, Sewafe, Kombayendeh, Gandorhun and Kayima) located in Kono district, Sierra Leone. All five are Community Health Centres (CHCs), with two CHCs benefiting from a comprehensive package of support (5S model) from the non-governmental organisation, Partners In Health (PIH). This support, dubbed as 5S health systems strengthening (HSS) model, will be elaborated in this article. The other three CHCs were not beneficiaries of the 5S model.
participantsThe study population comprised all patients and caregivers who attended outpatient services at the selected health facilities. We included adult outpatients over 18 years old and adult caregivers accompanying their children while waiting in the various outpatient departments. This study considered a sample size of 290 and the data were collected from 3rd March to 31st March 2021. OUTCOMES: PS was measured using an 11-item Likert scale questionnaire. The outcome was categorised as good or poor satisfaction level using the median value. Descriptive statistics were applied to assess satisfaction level and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was applied to identify factors associated with the outcome variable.
resultsOut of the 290 respondents included for analysis, the overall PS level was 63.8% (95% CI 58.1% to 69.0%). Around 69.2% (95% CI 62.1% to 75.4%) of respondents from PIH intervention sites and 53.9% (95% CI 44.1% to 63.4%) from the non-PIH intervention sites had a good satisfaction level. The multivariable binary logistic regression analysis indicated that PIH intervention site status (adjusted OR (AOR)=2.47, 95% CI 1.28 to 4.78), educational status of respondents (AOR=0.53, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.98), distance to health facility (AOR=0.40, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.87) and waiting time to receive care (AOR=0.41, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.76) were the significant factors associated with PS.
conclusionThe overall PS was relatively high andPIH-supported health facilities show better PS than non-PIH health facilities. In addition, patients' educational status, distance to health facility and waiting time were negatively associated with PS level. The findings suggest that PIH's model of health systems strengthening with targeted investment on the 5S model can be scaled up and the Ministry of Health could consider implementing this approach for improving the quality of services provided at the primary healthcare facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.