ArticleBMJ open2025
Construction of a risk prediction model for occupational noise-induced hearing loss using routine blood and biochemical indicators in Shenzhen, China: a predictive modelling study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applying Machine Learning Models to Predict Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Noise & healthPooled it
- Development and empirical validation of a multi-criteria decision-making model for the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) in high-exposure industrial settings.BMC public health · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Innovations in Transfusion Medicine: A Narrative Synthesis of Current Reviews.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancing Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Risk Assessment in the Era of Large-Scale Data.Noise & healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOccupational noise-induced hearing loss (ONIHL) represents a prevalent occupational health condition, traditionally necessitating multiple pure-tone audiometry assessments. We have developed and validated a machine learning model leveraging routine haematological and biochemical parameters, thereby offering novel insights into the risk prediction of ONIHL. DESIGN, SETTING AND
participantsThis study analysed data from 3297 noise-exposed workers in Shenzhen, including 160 ONIHL cases, with the data set divided into D1 (2868 samples, 107 ONIHL cases) and D2 (429 samples, 53 ONIHL cases). The inclusion criteria were formulated based on the GBZ49-2014 PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Model creation data set and validation data sets: ONIHL.
resultsThe prediction model, developed using XGBoost, demonstrated exceptional performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.942, a sensitivity of 0.875 and a specificity of 0.936 on the validation data set. On the test data set, the model achieved an AUC of 0.990. After implementing feature selection, the model was refined to include only 16 features, while maintaining strong performance on a newly acquired independent data set, with an AUC of 0.872, a balanced accuracy of 0.798, a sensitivity of 0.755 and a specificity of 0.840. The analysis of feature importance revealed that serum albumin (ALB), platelet distribution width (PDW), coefficient of variation in red cell distribution width (RDW-CV), serum creatinine (Scr) and lymphocyte percentage (LYMPHP) are critical factors for risk stratification in patients with ONIHL.
conclusionThe analysis of feature importance identified ALB, PDW, RDW-CV, Scr and LYMPHP as pivotal factors for risk stratification in patients with ONIHL. The machine learning model, using XGBoost, effectively distinguishes patients with ONIHLamong individuals exposed to noise, thereby facilitating early diagnosis and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.