ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2025
Nitrate-reducing microorganisms prevent souring of an oil field produced water storage pond.
Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Nitratidesulfovibrio sp. and Thermodesulfomicrobium sp.: Isolated Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria From Ahvaz Oilfield in Khouzestan.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026Article
- Editorial: celebrating the biogeosphere at the joint meeting of International Societies for Environmental Biogeochemistry and Subsurface Microbiology.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nitrate addition for mitigating sulfide production in oil field systems has been studied in laboratory settings and in some subsurface oil reservoirs. To promote water recycling and reuse associated with oil reservoirs produced by hydraulic fracturing, high-salinity produced waters are temporarily stored in surface ponds prior to subsequent reinjection into the subsurface. In this study, nitrate was added directly to a storage pond to prevent sulfide accumulation. DNA sequencing of pond water over a 4-week period revealed a decrease in the proportion of sulfate-reducing microorganisms following nitrate application. Sulfate levels remained stable during this period, whereas nitrate and nitrite fluctuated in the days following the nitrate addition. Metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) reconstructed from the pond water microbiome highlighted different organisms with genes for organoheterotrophic and lithoheterotrophic nitrate reduction, whereas genes associated with sulfide production via sulfate or thiosulfate reduction were barely detected. Within those MAGs, genes for acetate metabolism were observed, consistent with acetate decreasing substantially in the pond water in the presence of nitrate. After nitrate was consumed an increase in relative abundance of putative autotrophic microorganisms was observed (e.g. Arhodomonas, Guyparkeria, and Psychroflexus), corresponding to a drop in total inorganic carbon measurements in the storage pond. This trial offers an overview on microbial processes taking place in storage pond environments in response to nitrate addition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.