ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
CT-based Anatomic and Clinical Analysis of Iliac Screw Placement During Spinopelvic Fixation.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimIliac screws provide strong caudal anchorage for both long spinal fusions as well as short lumbopelvic fixations. However, anatomic based placement can be challenging, and complication rates are often underestimated. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe analysed 47 iliac screws being placed in 24 patients. Using postoperative computed tomography (CT), iliac screw placement was analysed with reference to anatomic landmarks. Iliac narrowings were described with regard to their relevance for iliac screw placement. Moreover, we analyzed clinical records for clinical complications. The latter were classified as intraoperative, postoperative, and radiological.
resultsFrom starting points, described by distance to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), the average iliac screw length was 71.2±13.7 mm, and the diameter was as wide as 7.9±0.7 mm. Divergence was 30.7±12.6° (transverse plane) and caudal orientation was 34.2±13.0° (sagittal orientation). General pelvic dimensions correlated significantly with each other, and certainly with the length of implanted screws. Different adverse events and complications occurred. A total of 20% of patients were found with at least partial extracortical malpositioning. The main group of complications were postoperative with painful prominence in 20% of cases, wound infection in 8.9% and wound healing disorders in 6.7%. Further complications were radiological screw loosening (11.1%). No complications were detected in 33.3% of patients.
conclusionOptimal iliac screw size relative to the individual anatomy in general is not achieved. In most cases compared to the literature, iliac screw dimensions could be both longer and thicker. Perfect anatomic placement can be challenging, which highlights the need for individual preoperative CT-based surgical planning to achieve a strong caudal anchorage in lumbopelvic fixations. In general, the diameter seems to be more important than the screw length.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.