ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Validation of Lipophosphonoxin-loaded Polycaprolactone Nanofiber Dressing for Full-thickness Wounds in a Porcine Model.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Porcine Wound Models: The Gold Standard for Translational Research in Cutaneous Healing.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimThis study investigated the therapeutic potential of lipophosphonoxin (LPPO), an antibacterial agent, loaded into polycaprolactone nanofiber dressings (NANO-LPPO) for full-thickness wound healing. Using a porcine model, we aimed to assess the impact of areal weight of the dressing (10, 20 and 30 g/m MATERIALS AND
methodsFull-thickness wounds were created on porcine skin and treated with the NANO-LPPO dressings of differing thickness. Positive control (Aquacel Ag+) and standard control (Jelonet) groups were included for comparison. Wound-healing progression was evaluated macroscopically and on the histological level.
resultsMacroscopic observations indicated no signs of infection in any group, with wounds covered by scabs by day 14. Thicker dressings (areal weights of 30 and 20 g/m
conclusionThe findings underscore the importance of optimizing dressing thickness for effective wound healing. NANO-LPPO dressings exhibit translational potential as a therapeutic option for full-thickness wounds, warranting further preclinical and regulatory evaluation to support clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.