ArticleBMJ open quality2025
'Halo effect': room impacts patient perception of overall hospital experience.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effect on satisfaction and functional perception of showing preoperative photographs during follow-up after ingrown toenail surgery.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Private hospital rooms offer potential advantages over semiprivate rooms, but the impact of room type on patient experience across multiple dimensions of care remains understudied. A retrospective study was conducted to investigate how room type influenced patients' perception of their experience at Stanford Health Care, a large university medical centre in California, USA. Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey data from medicine patients discharged from January 2018 to January 2020 (n=891) was analysed. The percentage of top responses was calculated for 18 survey sections including overall assessment. Patients in private rooms were more likely to give a top response (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.36), rating overall assessment and 10 other sections significantly higher than patients in semiprivate rooms. The greatest differences were in survey sections related to the room (room, hospital environment and visitors/family). However, private rooms also performed better on sections not directly related to room type (tests/treatments, care transitions and discharge). These widespread improvements suggest a 'halo effect', in which a patient's positive impression of their room may enhance their perception of overall care. These findings underscore the substantial influence of the care environment on patients' perceptions of their overall hospital experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.