Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40294958›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2025

'Halo effect': room impacts patient perception of overall hospital experience.

Ella Atsavapranee, Paul A Heidenreich, Mystique Smith-Bentley, Alpa Vyas, Lisa Shieh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ella AtsavapraneeStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5824-4521
Paul A HeidenreichStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Mystique Smith-BentleyStanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA.
Alpa VyasStanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA.
Lisa ShiehStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA lshieh@stanford.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Private hospital rooms offer potential advantages over semiprivate rooms, but the impact of room type on patient experience across multiple dimensions of care remains understudied. A retrospective study was conducted to investigate how room type influenced patients' perception of their experience at Stanford Health Care, a large university medical centre in California, USA. Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey data from medicine patients discharged from January 2018 to January 2020 (n=891) was analysed. The percentage of top responses was calculated for 18 survey sections including overall assessment. Patients in private rooms were more likely to give a top response (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.36), rating overall assessment and 10 other sections significantly higher than patients in semiprivate rooms. The greatest differences were in survey sections related to the room (room, hospital environment and visitors/family). However, private rooms also performed better on sections not directly related to room type (tests/treatments, care transitions and discharge). These widespread improvements suggest a 'halo effect', in which a patient's positive impression of their room may enhance their perception of overall care. These findings underscore the substantial influence of the care environment on patients' perceptions of their overall hospital experience.

Indexed as

HospitalsPatientsPatient SatisfactionPatients' RoomsPerceptionAdultAgedCaliforniaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesHealthcare quality improvementHealth services researchHospital medicinePatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID40294958
PMCPMC12035421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.