ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2025
SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 363 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Study of Yiqi Yangyin Formula in the Treatment of Primary Sjogren's Syndrome
Safety of Reduced Methotrexate Lab Monitoring: a Population-based, Target Trial Emulation Study
Pilot Exploratory Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate a Personalized Online Occupational Therapy Intervention Versus Usual Care in Adults With Scleroderma
Who cites it
363 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Safety and Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Aging Frailty: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Sponsorship Bias in Randomised Controlled Trials on Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-Research Study.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- High-flow nasal cannula oxygenation in sedated endoscopy for high-risk obstructive sleep apnea patients: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Annals of medicine · 2026Trial
- Comparing two posttraumatic stress disorder screening approaches to improve health outcomes in pregnant black women: a comparative effectiveness trial protocol.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Evaluation of a Mental Health Care App-Based Fatigue Management Program for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Remission: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Effect of Remote Vital Signs Monitoring in People Receiving Long-Term Oxygen Therapy: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Trial
- Protocol for the mesh matters project: evaluating the efficacy of suture mesh vs. planar mesh in small ventral hernia repair - a randomized, blinded multicenter study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Trial
- Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Laceback Ligature in Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Trial
- Protocol for a digital health-assisted cluster randomised controlled trial to prevent obesity in preschool children in Jinan, China.BMJ open · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Impact of the Population Medicine Multimorbidity Intervention in Xishui County (POPMIX) on People at High Risk for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Who Experience Mental Health Symptoms: Protocol for the POPMIX-MH Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Trial
- Sugammadex, neostigmine, and postoperative pulmonary complications: protocol of the SNaPP multicentre randomised controlled trial.BJA open · 2026Trial
- Comparison of liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine hydrochloride intercostal nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia after thoracic surgery: a multicenter, randomized, three arms trial protocol.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring the exercise dose to induce symptomatic and biomarker change in endometriosis: A protocol for a randomised controlled trial.MethodsX · 2026Article
303 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceThe protocol of a randomised trial is the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting, and external review. However, trial protocols vary in their completeness and often do not address key elements of design and conduct. The SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement was first published in 2013 as guidance to improve the completeness of trial protocols. Periodic updates incorporating the latest evidence and best practices are needed to ensure that the guidance remains relevant to users.
objectiveTo systematically update the SPIRIT recommendations for minimum items to address in the protocol of a randomised trial.
designWe completed a scoping review and developed a project specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence to generate a list of potential changes to the SPIRIT 2013 checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by lead authors of existing SPIRIT/CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) extensions (Harms, Outcomes, Non-pharmacological Treatment) and other reporting guidelines (TIDieR). The potential modifications were rated in a three-round Delphi survey followed by a consensus meeting.
findingsOverall, 317 individuals participated in the Delphi consensus process and 30 experts attended the consensus meeting. The process led to the addition of two new protocol items, revision to five items, deletion/merger of five items, and integration of key items from other relevant reporting guidelines. Notable changes include a new open science section, additional emphasis on the assessment of harms and description of interventions and comparators, and a new item on how patients and the public will be involved in trial design, conduct, and reporting. The updated SPIRIT 2025 statement consists of an evidence based checklist of 34 minimum items to address in a trial protocol, along with a diagram illustrating the schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments for trial participants. To facilitate implementation, we also developed an expanded version of the SPIRIT 2025 checklist and an accompanying explanation and elaboration document. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Widespread endorsement and adherence to the updated SPIRIT 2025 statement have the potential to enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, funders, research ethics committees, journals, trial registries, policymakers, regulators, and other reviewers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.