ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Social Media Activities With Different Content Characteristics and Adolescent Mental Health: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitigating the Negative Effects of Internet Browsing on Young People's Resilience and Outlook on Life Through Classic Grimms' Fairy Tales: Exploratory Randomized Controlled Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Trial
- The association between social media content production and adolescent physical health promotion: the chain mediating roles of online social support and positive psychological capital.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Navigating the Algorithm: A Narrative Review of Social Media's Impact on Mental Health in Clinical and Non-Clinical Adolescent Populations.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Is Going Analog Good for Children and Teens' Mental Health and Well-Being?Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Analysis of the gender-specific risk factors of social anxiety among left-behind middle school students in Deyang.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent mental health concerns are rising in the United States, with social media often cited as a contributing factor, although research findings remain mixed. A key limitation is the simplistic view of social media use, which fails to consistently predict well-being. Scholars call for a more nuanced framework and a better understanding of how social media use influences adolescent mental health through various psychosocial mechanisms.
objectiveUsing the Multidimensional Model of Social Media Use, we explored how 4 activities with various content characteristics (intimate directed communication, intimate broadcasting, positive broadcasting, and positive content consumption) are associated with depression and anxiety through 3 psychosocial mediators: social support, approval anxiety, and social comparison.
methodsCross-sectional survey data were collected through Qualtrics' panel service from a sample of adolescents whose gender and racial or ethnic distributions were nationally representative (N=2105; mean age 15.39, SD 1.82 years). Participants passed attention checks to ensure data validity. Measures included 9 validated scales (Cronbach α=0.83-0.91): 4 social media activities (intimate directed communication, intimate broadcasting, positive broadcasting, and positive content consumption), 3 mediators (social support, approval anxiety, and social comparison), and 2 mental health outcomes (depression and anxiety). Using Mplus, we performed 2-step structural equation modeling. Confirmatory factor analysis established scale validity, and path analysis tested the hypothesized and exploratory associations between social media activities, mediators, and mental health, controlling for demographic covariates and the amount of phone use. Model fit criteria (comparative fit index and Tucker-Lewis index were close to or greater than 0.95; root mean square error of approximation was less than 0.08) were met. Significance was determined using a false discovery rate control, with the familywise type 1 error rate set at 0.05.
resultsOur findings showed that positive broadcasting was associated with lower depression (β=-.14; P<.001) and anxiety (β=-.06; P=.03), mainly through the direct paths. The other 3 activities were related to more mental health problems. Specifically, intimate directed communication was associated with greater depression (β=.06; P=.03) and anxiety (β=.06; P=.04); intimate broadcasting was associated with greater anxiety (β=.07; P=.02); and positive content consumption was related to higher depression (β=.13; P<.001). Approval anxiety or social comparison played a salient role in these total effects.
conclusionsThe findings highlight the importance of distinguishing social media activities when assessing risks and benefits. Intimate directed communication, intimate broadcasting, and positive content consumption became risk factors for increased anxiety and depression through approval anxiety, social comparison, or both. Positive broadcasting was related to better mental health because of its direct associations with lower depression and anxiety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.