ArticleApplied clinical informatics2025
Development and Evaluation of Clinical Decision Support for Immigrant Child Health Screening in Primary Care.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While electronic health record (EHR)-based tools for refugee health screening exist, support for other immigrant children has lagged. Reasons include lack of time, difficulty determining screening eligibility, and lack of awareness of screening recommendations. EHR-based tools to promote immigrant child health screening (ICHS) can address these challenges, but guidance is needed for tools that are usable by clinicians and acceptable to immigrant families.Develop useful EHR-based tools to support ICHS while incorporating evaluation of acceptability, usability, and implementation effort.We followed a five-step human-centered design approach to develop EHR-based tools for ICHS. This included: (1) representative users completing semi-structured interviews. (2) Health professionals and community advisory groups providing ongoing guidance. (3) Developing a functional prototype. (4) Usability testing of the prototype. And (5) an assessment of the implementation effort involving a second site installation coupled with expert implementation time estimations.Sixteen interviewees discussed screening barriers and how EHR-based tools could support discussing nativity (country of birth). From the interview findings and in consultation with advisory group members, we developed an EHR-based toolkit including noninterruptive alerts, an order set, and a documentation prompt. Ten clinicians completed usability testing. All recognized the alert and asked country of birth. Most (9) were satisfied with the system. All felt it was easy to use, helpful, and would not hinder patient care. Content experts (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.