ArticleDrug research2025
A Real-world Pharmacovigilance Study Of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Events For Gender Of Voriconazole Drugs.
Article in Drug research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and opportunities in the management of severe pneumonia. Key concepts from the Seventh Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2025.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Review
- Comparative risk of arrhythmias associated with systemic antifungal agents: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- A multidimensional investigation of myelosuppression associated with sintilimab: integrating pharmacovigilance signal mining with real-world clinical evidence.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Analysis of ocular adverse events associated with SNRIs.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Pharmacovigilance assessment of drug-induced aplastic anemia: analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Voriconazole versus isavuconazole for invasive aspergillosis: a retrospective analysis in a medically insured U.S. population (2017-2020).Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To detect the gender variations in adverse events (AEs) of voriconazole, promote personalised medicine.A normalized dataset from Q1 2004 to Q4 2022 from the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) was analyses. The reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and P value were used to examine data from the FAERS database to detect risk signals and quantify the presence and extent of gender variations in voriconazole adverse events.A total of 7670 cases (female/male (2785/4885)) of adverse reactions to voriconazole were analysed, and drug interaction (ROR 1.30 (1.10,1.54)), death and sudden death (ROR 1.31 (1.06,1.61)), actinic keratosis (ROR 1.98 (1.10,3.57)) were found to be significantly more frequent in male patients than in female patients.We found that gender was a determinant in voriconazole-related AEs using FAERS. Our results require future validation due to the inherent limits of this open data source, but they also identify potential contributing elements for a customised side effect profiling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.