ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
Self-Refinement of Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo via Non-Orthogonal Configuration Interaction.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selecting Optimal Unrestricted Hartree-Fock Trial Wave Functions for Phaseless Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo: Accuracy and Limitations in Modeling Three Iron-Sulfur Clusters.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Bias and Its Control in Stochastic Approaches to Electronic-Structure Theory.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For optimal accuracy, auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC) requires trial states consisting of multiple Slater determinants. We develop an efficient algorithm to select the determinants from an AFQMC random walk eliminating the need for other methods. When determinants contribute significantly to the nonorthogonal configuration interaction energy, we include them in the trial state. These refined trial wave functions significantly reduce the phaseless bias and sampling variance of the local energy estimator. With 100 to 200 determinants, we lower the error of AFQMC by up to a factor of 10 for second-row elements that are not accurately described with a Hartree-Fock trial wave function. For the HEAT set, we improve the average error to within chemical accuracy. For benzene, the largest studied system, we reduce AFQMC error by 80% with 214 Slater determinants and find a 10-fold increase of the time to solution. We show that phaseless errors prevail in systems with static correlation or strong spin contamination. For such systems, improved trial states enable stable free-projection AFQMC calculations, achieving chemical accuracy even in the strongly correlated regime.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.