ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2025
Wheelchair Servicing for Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reliability assessment of power wheelchairs.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wheelchairs are assistive mobility devices known to experience frequent part failures and breakdowns within 6 months of regular use. No tools or technologies exist to monitor the wheelchairs' condition or usage and inform stakeholders and users regarding when or how often they need to undergo servicing to avoid critical part failure. Objective: We aimed to test the association between wheelchair usage and manual wheelchair damage, part failures, and consequences for older wheelchair users and evaluate their preferences for a new wheelchair servicing technology. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed with older manual wheelchair users atInstituto Nacional de Geriatría in Mexico. Demographic data, wheelchair information, failure counts, and preferences for new technology (sensor and smartphone app for servicing) were collected using surveys. Road shocks experienced by the wheelchair were collected for a week using a sensor. Results: Ten participants (mean [SD] age, 78.8 [11.8] y; 8 female and 2 male) participated. Seven experienced an average (SD) of 2.86 (1.36) self-reported part failures. Road shocks correlated with self-reported loose brake failures (r(8)=0.58, P=.09), the damaged condition of tires (r(8)=0.61, P=.1), and the damaged condition of brakes (r(8)=0.58, P=.099). No consequences were reported. Part failures increased as self-maintenance occurrences increased (r(9)=0.67, P=.04). More than 8 participants responded that they would like to monitor the wheelchair's condition using the new technology and purchase it at an average (SD) price of US $28.95 (18.13). Conclusions: In this study, the association between wheelchair usage and failures showed that data-driven wheelchair inspection schedules should be determined through a collaborative approach involving researchers and stakeholders in wheelchair repair provision and older adult users. Older adults are interested in using new technology to engage in wheelchair servicing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.