ArticleNeurology2025
Survival Differences Between Individuals With Typical and Atypical Phenotypes of Alzheimer Disease.
Article in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atypical Alzheimer disease: a multi-axis framework toward defining heterogeneity.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Improving the clinical trial landscape for patients with atypical variants of Alzheimer's disease: a call to action.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- Biomarker-integrated prognostic stagings for Alzheimer's Disease.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Predicting Alzheimer's Disease Progression from Sparse Multimodal Data by NeuralODE Models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic utility of plasma p-tau217 differs by Alzheimer's disease tau-based subtypes.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesSurvival estimates for individuals with Alzheimer disease (AD) are informative to understand the disease trajectory, but precise estimates for atypical AD variants are scarce. Atypical AD variants are characterized by nonamnestic phenotypes, an early onset, and lower prevalence of
methodsFrom the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort, we retrospectively selected patients with biomarker-confirmed sporadic AD presenting at the memory clinic in the mild cognitive impairment or dementia stage. Patients were classified into atypical AD phenotypes (PCA, lvPPA, bvAD; multidisciplinary consensus and retrospective case finding) and a typical AD reference group (excluding unclassifiable atypical presentations or unconfirmed future AD dementia). Survival estimates from the first visit to death/censoring (Central Public Administration) were determined (Kaplan-Meier analysis) and compared (log-rank tests) across diagnostic groups. To assess associations of atypical AD with mortality, Cox proportional hazard models were constructed including age, sex, education, MMSE score, and
resultsA total of 2,081 patients (aged 65 ± 8 years, 52% female) were classified as typical AD (n = 1,801) or atypical AD (n = 280; PCA [n = 112], lvPPA [n = 86], and bvAD [n = 82]). The estimated median survival time for atypical AD of 6.3 years (95% CI [5.8-6.9]) was shorter than for typical AD (7.2 [7.0-7.5], DISCUSSION: Survival in atypical AD (PCA, lvPPA, bvAD) was shorter compared with typical AD. These atypical variants are associated with increased mortality beyond age, sex, education,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.