Trial reportJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2025
Premature Atrial Contractions as a Marker of Atrial Cardiopathy: A Revised Analysis of the ARCADIA Randomized Trial.
Trial report in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03192215 (AtRial Cardiopathy and Antithrombotic Drugs In Prevention After Cryptogenic Stroke), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
AtRial Cardiopathy and Antithrombotic Drugs In Prevention After Cryptogenic Stroke
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAtrial cardiopathy may be associated with an increased risk of stroke independent of atrial fibrillation (AF). In the ARCADIA trial, apixaban was not superior to aspirin in preventing recurrent stroke among patients with a cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy. We aimed to determine whether the presence of at least one premature atrial complex (PAC), a known harbinger of AF and stroke, would enhance the ability to identify individuals most likely to benefit from apixaban.
methodsIn ARCADIA, atrial cardiopathy was defined by NT-proBNP > 250 pg/mL, a P-wave terminal force greater than 5000 μV × ms in lead V1, or a left atrial diameter index ≥ 3 cm/m² on echocardiogram. For the current analysis, the presence of any PAC on the baseline 12-lead ECG was substituted for the less atrial-specific NT-proBNP criterion. The presence of any PAC was also assessed as a sole atrial cardiopathy criterion.
resultsOf the 1015 patients randomized in ARCADIA, 85 had at least one PAC. The revised atrial cardiopathy criteria were met by 593 patients; 301 were randomized to apixaban and 292 to aspirin. The annualized recurrent stroke rates were 3.1% for apixaban versus 4.4% for aspirin (HR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.38-1.34, p = 0.29). No differences in risk of recurrent stroke among participants with PACs, compared to those without PACs, were observed.
conclusionIn patients enrolled in the ARCARDIA trial, utilizing the presence of PACs as a potential marker of atrial cardiopathy did not reveal definitive evidence of benefit of apixaban compared to aspirin.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03192215.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.