Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40294110›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Semantic enhancement and cross-modal interaction fusion for sentiment analysis in social media.

Guangyu Mu, Ying Chen, Xiurong Li, Li Dai, Jiaxiu Dai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guangyu MuSchool of Management Science and Information Engineering, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun, China.
Ying ChenSchool of Management Science and Information Engineering, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun, China.
Xiurong LiFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8508-2185
Li DaiSchool of Management Science and Information Engineering, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun, China.
Jiaxiu DaiSchool of Management Science and Information Engineering, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of social media has significantly impacted sentiment analysis, essential for understanding public opinion and predicting social trends. However, modality fusion in sentiment analysis can introduce a lot of noise because of the differences in semantic representations among various modalities, ultimately impacting the accuracy of classification results. Thus, this paper presents a Semantic Enhancement and Cross-Modal Interaction Fusion (SECIF) model for sentiment analysis to address these issues. Firstly, BERT and ResNet extract feature representations from text and images. Secondly, the GMHA mechanism is proposed to aggregate important semantic information and mitigate the influence of noise. Then, an ICN module is created to capture complex contextual dependencies and enhance the capability of text feature representations. Finally, a cross-modal interaction fusion module is implemented. Text features are considered primary, and image features are auxiliary, enabling the profound integration of textual and visual features. The model's performance is optimized by combining cross-entropy and KL divergence losses. The experiments are conducted using a dataset collected from public opinion events on Sina Weibo. The results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms comparison models. The SECIF model improves by 11.19%, 82.27%, and 4.83% over the average accuracy of the text-only, image-only, and multimodal models, respectively. The proposed SECIF model is compared with ten baseline models on the publicly available datasets. The experimental results show that the SECIF model improves accuracy by 4.70% and F1 score by 6.56%. Through multimodal sentiment analysis, governments can better understand public emotions and opinion trends, facilitating more targeted and effective management strategies.

Indexed as

SemanticsSocial MediaAlgorithmsHumansPublic Opinion

Identifiers

PMID40294110
PMCPMC12036922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.