Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40294095›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2025

Dorsomedial and ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions differentially impact social influence and temporal discounting.

Zhilin Su, Mona M Garvert, Lei Zhang, Todd A Vogel, Jo Cutler, Masud Husain, Sanjay G Manohar, Patricia L Lockwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. National identity reconfigures brain responses from "them" to "us".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhilin SuCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6941-0970
Mona M GarvertFaculty of Human Sciences, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Lei ZhangCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Todd A VogelCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Jo CutlerCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Masud HusainDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sanjay G ManoharDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Patricia L LockwoodCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7195-9559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) has long been associated with economic and social decision-making in neuroimaging studies. Several debates question whether different ventral mPFC (vmPFC) and dorsal mPFC (dmPFC) regions have specific functions or whether there is a gradient supporting social and nonsocial cognition. Here, we tested an unusually large sample of rare participants with focal damage to the mPFC (N = 33), individuals with lesions elsewhere (N = 17), and healthy controls (N = 71) (total N = 121). Participants completed a temporal discounting task to estimate their baseline discounting preferences before learning the preferences of two other people, one who was more temporally impulsive and one more patient. We used Bayesian computational models to estimate baseline discounting and susceptibility to social influence after learning others' economic preferences. mPFC damage increased susceptibility to impulsive social influence compared to healthy controls and increased overall susceptibility to social influence compared to those with lesions elsewhere. Importantly, voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) of computational parameters showed that this heightened susceptibility to social influence was attributed specifically to damage to the dmPFC (area 9; permutation-based threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) p < 0.025). In contrast, lesions in the vmPFC (areas 13 and 25) and ventral striatum were associated with a preference for seeking more immediate rewards (permutation-based TFCE p < 0.05). We show that the dmPFC is causally implicated in susceptibility to social influence, with distinct ventral portions of mPFC involved in temporal discounting. These findings provide causal evidence for sub-regions of the mPFC underpinning fundamental social and cognitive processes.

Indexed as

Delay DiscountingPrefrontal CortexAdultAgedBayes TheoremBrain MappingDecision MakingFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRewardSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID40294095
PMCPMC12036846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.