ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Comparison of twelve-layer concentric object (TLCO) and Line segmentations methods to determine the renal corticomedullary sodium gradient (CMSG) with a 3 T MRI.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of twelve-layer concentric object (TLCO) and Line segmentations methods to determine the renal corticomedullary sodium gradient (CMSG) with a 3 T MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose
methodsTen healthy volunteers were examined on a 3 T MRI-system.
resultsThe evaluated CMSG by the two methods does not differ statistically significantly. Compared to the Line method, the TLCO method provides improved results in terms of reliability, precision, reproducibility, and concordance in intra- and inter-reader analyses. A CMSG of (6.7 ± 2.6) mM/mm was determined using the TLCO method in the segmentation process with the lowest standard deviation.
conclusionThe TLCO method shows superior performance in determining the CMSG compared to the Line method. Accordingly, the use of the TLCO method is recommended for future renal CMSG studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.