ArticleMicrobial genomics2025
Comprehensive genome-wide analysis for the safety assessment of microbial biostimulants in agricultural applications.
Article in Microbial genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolite-Resolved Validation of Bacterial Organophosphate Transformation in Soil: A Critical Review of Selected Organophosphate Case Studies.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026Article
- Research Progress on the Effect ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Complete genome sequences of 12Microbiology resource announcements · 2026Article
- Article
- Drought-tolerant rhizobacterial consortia enhance grapevine growth and tolerance to water deficit.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Genomics control of biostimulant-induced stress tolerance and crop yield enhancement.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial biostimulants (MBs) offer a sustainable approach to agriculture by helping to reduce reliance on synthetic fertilizers. However, as MBs are intentionally released into the environment, their safety should be rigorously assessed. While taxa with qualified presumption of safety (QPS) benefit from established safety indications, non-QPS taxa lack such guidance. To address this gap, we propose a pipeline combining whole genome sequencing (WGS) and extensive literature search (ELS) data to evaluate microbial safety. We analysed public genomes of three QPS species (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.