Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40294073›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Comparison of absorption and excretion of test compounds in sucking versus chewing pests.

Clara I Römer, Roman Ashauer, Beate I Escher, Juliane Hollender, René Burkhard, Kristin Höfer, Michel Muehlebach, Anke Buchholz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Clara I RömerSyngenta Crop Protection AG, Research Biology and Chemistry, Stein, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0003-3283-4130
Roman AshauerSyngenta Crop Protection AG, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9579-8793
Beate I EscherDepartment of Cell Toxicology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5304-706X
Juliane HollenderEawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
René BurkhardSyngenta Crop Protection AG, Münchwilen, Switzerland.
Kristin HöferSyngenta Crop Protection AG, Research Biology and Chemistry, Stein, Switzerland.
Michel MuehlebachSyngenta Crop Protection AG, Research Biology and Chemistry, Stein, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4296-9827
Anke BuchholzSyngenta Crop Protection AG, Research Biology and Chemistry, Stein, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1714-6212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical understanding of how pests interact with active ingredients is essential for the development of new insect control solutions to maintain crop quality and quantity by reducing insect damage. Absorption of insecticides into insect bodies of targeted pest species is the first critical step that confounds the efficacy of insecticides. This study investigated how different feeding behaviour of two pests, Myzus persicae and Spodoptera littoralis, affects the absorption, metabolism, and excretion (AME) of seven insecticidally inactive test compounds. A feeding contact assay for the chewing pest (Lepidopteran larvae) and an oral ingestion assay for the sucking pest (aphids) was used to investigate the AME of test compounds with agrochemical-like structural motifs. The standardized assays comprised of an exposure period with treated diet and a subsequent depuration period with untreated diet. The results showed that S. littoralis larvae differed from M. persicae in their compound quantities absorbed into the insect body and in their excretion products at the end of the exposure or depuration periods. We suggest that this is caused by their different ingestion types and rates resulting in different absorption and excretion quantities. Further, we found differences in the metabolism (timing and biotransformation pathways) of compounds between both species. Notably, certain compounds remained detectable in both pests after the depuration period, suggesting compound and species-specific metabolism and excretion. Our results highlight the complex interplay between feeding biology of insects, in particular the critical role of excretion products, and the exposure to different compounds that lead to species-specific AME.

Indexed as

AphidsInsecticidesSpodopteraAnimalsFeeding BehaviorLarvaInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID40294073
PMCPMC12036848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.