ArticlePloS one2025
Individual action, sharing scarce resources, sharing information? A study on how to effectively manage forest pests and diseases based on carbon trading.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, forest pests and diseases have had a significant impact on forest ecosystems. To incentivize corporations to manage forest pests and diseases, the government provides certain carbon compensations to enterprises involved in this management. In the process of controlling forest pests and diseases, the modes of collaboration between the government and corporations are primarily categorized into three modes: independent action, scarce resource sharing, and information sharing. To determine the applicability of each relational mode, this paper constructs three differential game models and compares and analyzes the equilibrium results obtained from these modes. The research indicates that if the cost of government-managed forest pest and disease control is high and the benefits of such control are low, then the scarce resource sharing mode can offer the government the maximum benefit; conversely, the information sharing mode can provide the government with the greatest benefit. If the cost and benefits of corporate-managed forest pest and disease control are low, then the information sharing mode can offer corporations the maximum benefit; otherwise, the scarce resource sharing mode can provide corporations with the greatest benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.