ArticlePloS one2025
Are you with me? Co-occurrence tests from community ecology can identify positive and negative epistasis between inversions in Mimulus guttatus.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chromosomal inversions are structural genetic variants that can play a crucial role in adaptive evolution and speciation. Patterns of attraction and repulsion among unlinked inversions - whether they tend to be carried by the same or different individuals- can indicate how selection is acting on these polymorphisms. In this study, we compare analytical techniques using data from 64 inversions that segregate among 1373 F2 plants of the yellow monkeyflower Mimulus guttatus. Mendelian assortment provides a strong null hypothesis for [Formula: see text] contingency tests. Here, we show how co-occurrence metrics used in community ecology can provide additional insight regarding coupling and repulsion of inversions at genotypic level. The centered Jaccard/Tanimoto index and the affinity score describe the specific way that inversions interact to generate epistasis for plant survival. We further explore the use of network analysis to visualize inversion interactions and to identify essential third and fourth order interactions, which expand the traditional pairwise scope of the co-occurrence metrics. We suggest that a combination of different statistical approaches will provide the most complete characterization of the fitness effects, both for inversions and other polymorphisms essential to adaptation and speciation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.