ArticlePloS one2025
Eco-products value realization and eco-industry design of afforestation in the Karst Desertification Control.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Karst desertification (KD) severely restricts rural development in China's karst regions. To ensure both ecological security and economic sustainability, afforestation is essential for karst desertification control (KDC). This paper utilizes scientific approaches, including Ecological Product (EP) value accounting (which evaluates the value of ecosystem - provided products and services for humans) and data statistical analysis, to explore the functions of afforestation in EP distribution, value realization, and Ecological Industry (EI) formation. The study reveals several key findings. (1) In the three study areas, afforestation significantly impacts the regulation of service product values. For instance, in the Shibing area, Horsetail pine is the main EP supplier; in the langyashan study area, it is cypress; and in the Zunhua study area, oil pine. (2) In the southern karst (exemplified by the Shibing study area), EP values are influenced by factors like stand height, diameter at breast height, altitude, organic carbon, and soil total nitrogen. In the northern karst (using langyashan study area and Zunhua study areas as examples), soil total nitrogen, organic carbon, and porosity are the main determinants. (3) With decreasing altitude, industrial distribution shifts from an ecological - forest - based industry to one with co - existing ecological and economic forests, and finally to an economic - forest - based industry. Rational selection and breeding of economic forest species aid in creating ecolabel brands. This small - watershed - scale analysis improves the accuracy of assessing ecological and economic development in karst areas, providing a scientific basis for decision - making to strengthen ecological restoration and enhance people's well - being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.