Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40294014›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Association between primary care physicians' practice models and referral rates to specialists: A sex-based cross-sectional study.

Bahram Rahman, David Kirkwood, Glenda Babe, Lauren E Griffith, David Price, Rebecca H Correia, Darly Dash, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, Andrew P Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bahram RahmanPhysician and Provider Services Division, Ministry of Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-3463-9492
David KirkwoodICES (formerly known as the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Glenda BabeDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lauren E GriffithDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
David PriceMcMaster Family Health Team, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Rebecca H CorreiaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2949-2400
Darly DashDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lauren Lapointe-ShawICES (formerly known as the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew P CostaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Referrals from primary care physicians (PCPs) to specialists are a key function of the primary care system, enabling access to secondary and tertiary health care services. Since the early 2000s, Ontario has implemented substantial primary care practice reforms, however, PCP referral patterns have not been examined since reforms were implemented. We conducted a cross-sectional study in Ontario analyzing PCPs' referral patterns to specialists from January 1 to December 31, 2019. Data from physician administrative and Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) billing databases were linked for 9,301 PCPs practicing comprehensive primary care with 11.8 million patients. We calculated referral rates per physician and built a multivariable Poisson regression model stratified by physician sex, recognizing that female and male PCPs practice primary care differently, to examine the association between PCP's referral rates and their practice model. Subgroup analyses were conducted for medical, surgical, diagnostics and General Practitioner (GP) focused practice specialties. Overall, PCPs in fee-for-service practice models (females: 0.72, 95% CI 0.71-0.72, males 0.71 95% CI 0.71-0.72) and Family Health Groups (females: 0.90, 95% CI 0.90-0.91, males 0.85 95% CI 0.84-0.85) had lower adjusted relative referral rates compared to those in Family Health Teams (FHTs); a finding that was consistent across medical and surgical specialties. Younger, part-time PCPs, those practicing in urban areas, those with larger roster sizes and those affiliated with a large practice group showed higher adjusted referral rates. Female PCPs tended to be younger (average age 47.2 years vs. 54.1 years for males; SMD=0.56), work part-time (32.1% vs. 17.9% for males; SMD=0.33), had a smaller patient roster (average 1,097.8 rostered patients vs. 1,442.1 for males; SMD=0.44), and had higher unadjusted referral rates to specialists compared to male PCPs (32.9 vs. 29.9 per 100 rostered patients). PCPs' referral patterns in Ontario vary by practice model and PCP's sex. Future changes to primary care practices should account for their effects on referral volumes to specialists.

Indexed as

Physicians, Primary CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'Referral and ConsultationSpecializationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPrimary Health CareSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID40294014
PMCPMC12036902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.