ArticlePloS one2025
Exploring vaccination attitudes in African communities in Canada: A mixed-methods study protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "As soon as it's trying to be persuasive, my skepticism kicks in": A qualitative study to co-design vaccine communication strategies with vaccine hesitant adults in Canada.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVaccine hesitancy is a complex issue influenced by many interacting factors. While literature on its contributing causes continues to expand, there is limited research on the contextual and cultural dynamics that shape vaccine hesitancy among African-born individuals in Canada. Identifying and understanding these factors is critical in developing targeted health interventions that address specific barriers to vaccination within this community. The study aims to explore the unique socio-cultural and context-specific elements of vaccine hesitancy among African community members living in Canada. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will use a mixed-methods approach to investigate vaccine hesitancy among African community members living in Southwestern Ontario. In the qualitative study, we will conduct semi-structured interviews and participatory focus groups within each of the selected study areas: London, Windsor and Chatham-Kent. The qualitative data will be collected, transcribed and then analyzed thematically using NVivo 12. For the quantitative study, we will provide participants with surveys to accurately assess the predictors of vaccine hesitancy. The quantitative data will be analyzed using logistic regression to explore how socio-cultural influences, trust, and accessible information impact vaccine hesitancy. DISCUSSION: This study addresses a significant gap in existing literature by providing cultural and contextual insights on the drivers of vaccine hesitancy among African-born individuals. Using a mix-method design, the study offers a rich understanding of the influences shaping vaccine decision-making. The findings will support the development of health policies and interventions aimed at improving overall health outcomes for African communities within Canada.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.