Trial reportPloS one2025
The comparative effectiveness of progressive relaxation training on pain characteristics, attack frequency, activity self-efficacy, and pain-related disability in women with episodic tension-type headache and migraine.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Investigation Of The Effect Of Progressive Relaxation Training On Pain Characteristics, Attack Frequency, Perception Of Activity Self-Efficiency And Social Participation In Women With Tension-Type Headache And Migraine
The Effects of Progressive Muscle Relaxation on Pain Intensity, Pain Catastrophizing, and Quality of Life in Patients With End Stage Renal Disease: A Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological approaches to manage Tension-Type Headache: a Systematic Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Pooled it
- Psychological interventions for migraine.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Early rising as an intervention to alleviate anxiety and enhance self-efficacy among college students.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeEpisodic tension headache (TTH) and migraine, both categorized as primary headache types, account for 60-90% of headache complaints and are three times more common among young women. This study aimed to explore the comparative effectiveness of progressive relaxation training (PRT) on pain characteristics, attack frequency, activity self-efficacy, and pain-related disability in women with episodic TTH and migraine. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06050382). This prospective study included women with episodic TTH (n=20) and migraine (n=20). The pain intensity, impact of headaches on life, activity self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, and pain-related disability levels of both groups were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Occupational Self-Assessment Scale (OSAS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2 (WHODAS-II) pre- and post-intervention, respectively. Both TTH and migraine groups received PRT twice a week for six weeks.
resultsWithin-group comparisons showed significant decreases in attack frequency, VAS, HIT-6, PCS, and WHODAS-II scores in both groups post-intervention (p<0.001). Also, both groups showed an increase in OSAS proficiency scores (p<0.001). The between-group comparison showed that the attack frequency, VAS, HIT-6, PCS, and WHODAS-II scores were lower in the migraine group than the TTH group. However, all sub-scores of the OSAS were higher in the migraine group (p<0.001).
conclusionsPRT showed positive effects on pain intensity, attack frequency, activity self-efficacy, and pain-related disability in both groups, more so in the TTH group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.