ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Assessing the global implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on the cervical cancer elimination initiative.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted many public health programs; understanding these disruptions is critical for directing future resources. In a project studying the implementation of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing-based cervical cancer screening, we queried about the impact of the pandemic on screening programs globally. In consultation with World Health Organization's Regional Advisors, program managers, government officials, and clinicians involved in the implementation of HPV testing-based cervical cancer screening programs were invited to participate in semi-structured, in-depth, interviews. Interview notes and transcripts were used for inductive analysis, focusing on responses to the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on screening programs. Thirty-two interviews were conducted with participants between the age of 29 and 61 years, representing programs from 25 countries. Six key themes were noted. Regarding disruptions, (1) the entire cancer continuum was affected, leading to delays or, in some cases even cessation of vaccination, screening, and treatment programs; and (2) a heightened sense of fear around contracting and transmitting COVID-19 shifted government priorities and impacted healthcare delivery. Nonetheless, participants noted constructive ways in which programs leveraged the impact of the pandemic: (1) at the community level, participants were able to leverage an increased understanding and acceptance surrounding the importance of preventive health behaviors; (2) for HPV-testing: molecular laboratories became well-equipped with better technician training, increasing overall HPV-testing capacities; (3) the pandemic promoted virtual healthcare systems; and (4) for planning: shutdowns allowed time to plan for program scale-up. In many ways, the pandemic response provided evidence supporting countries' abilities to mobilize resources. While disruptions were noted, the pandemic provided implementers with opportunities to strengthen screening programs, which should be further assessed in future sustainability research on cervical cancer prevention and control.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.