Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40293974›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

A Critical juncture in global health: Leveraging historical institutionalism to examine PEPFAR dependency and inform the development of self-reliant public health systems.

Alison Wiyeh, Patience Komba, Samuel Akombeng Ojong, Charles S Wiysonge, Bih Moki-Suh, Patricia Sadate-Ngatchou, Ferdinand C Mukumbang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alison WiyehDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0417-3948
Patience KombaDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3023-0918
Samuel Akombeng OjongWomen's and Reproductive Health Concentration, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3983-9642
Charles S WiysongeCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1273-4779
Bih Moki-SuhDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Patricia Sadate-NgatchouPNP Ahead Limited Liability Company, Sammamish, Washington, United States of America.
Ferdinand C MukumbangDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has played an important role in expanding access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and significantly reducing HIV/AIDS mortality globally. However, policy shifts in the United States(US) aimed at realigning foreign aid with US national interests have introduced significant uncertainty regarding PEPFAR funding in 2025, threatening to undermine decades of progress in the global HIV/AIDS response. Many countries that have long relied on PEPFAR funding are trapped in a cycle where sustained donor aid has limited their transition to self-reliant, country-led HIV programs. We leverage historical institutionalism to examine how past structures, especially colonial-era institutions, have constrained African nations and limited their capacity for self-determination through the phenomenon of path dependency. Foreign aid, often aligned with the geopolitical and economic interests of donor nations, has further undermined institutional resilience in aid-recipient countries. The recent halt in PEPFAR funding, marks a critical juncture in global health, with the potential to catalyze long-overdue systemic reforms in African health systems. As uncertainty around U.S. foreign aid grows, we anticipate an increase in engagement from private and philanthropic funders. Without corrective action, the persistence of inefficient institutional pathways will continue to undermine the impact of financial investments in many African institutions, jeopardizing the effectiveness and sustainability of initiatives aimed at improving national health outcomes. For sustainable reforms in former colonies, countries must first acknowledge the constraints of colonial legacies, decolonize mindsets and institutions, define their own development priorities, and establish transparent, accountable governance, alongside political stability as fundamental pillars for progress. PEPFAR is the first major global health program to be affected, and it is unlikely to be the last. How much longer will recipient countries remain dependent on donor funding to safeguard the health and lives of their populations?

Identifiers

PMID40293974
PMCPMC12036835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.