ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Identification and Validation of an Explainable Prediction Model of Sepsis in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Hemopexin as a Sepsis-Specific Signal After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Article
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Hemopexin as a Candidate Biomarker for Secondary Sepsis and In-Hospital Outcome After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Exploratory Translational Proteomics Study.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Transforming Intracerebral Hemorrhage Care with Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Endometrial immune dysregulation shapes CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for postoperative sepsis prediction in ICU patients following intracranial hematoma evacuation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- A reinforcement learning-guided interpretable method for postoperative sepsis prediction with Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion.Frontiers in big data · 2026Article
- Association of the atherogenic index of plasma with in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- Relative hyperglycemia and new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a focus on stress hyperglycemia ratio.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Machine learning models predict risk of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is a life-threatening condition frequently observed in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) who are critically ill. Early and accurate identification and prediction of sepsis are crucial. Machine learning (ML)-based predictive models exhibit promising sepsis prediction capabilities in emergency settings. However, their application in predicting sepsis among patients with ICH is still limited.
objectiveThe aim of the study is to develop an ML-driven risk calculator for early prediction of sepsis in patients with ICH who are critically ill and to clarify feature importance and explain the model using the Shapley Additive Explanations method.
methodsPatients with ICH admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database between 2008 and 2022 were divided into training and internal test sets. The external test was performed using the eICU Collaborative Research Database, which includes over 200,000 ICU admissions across the United States between 2014 and 2015. Sepsis following ICU admission was identified using Sepsis-3.0 through clinical diagnosis combining elevation of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment by ≥2 points with suspected infection. The Boruta algorithm was used for feature selection, confirming 29 features. Nine ML algorithms were used to construct the prediction models. Predictive performance was compared using several evaluation metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The Shapley Additive Explanations technique was used to interpret the final model, and a web-based risk calculator was constructed for clinical practice.
resultsOverall, 2414 patients with ICH were enrolled from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database, with 1689 and 725 patients assigned to the training and internal test sets, respectively. An external test set of 2806 patients with ICH from the eICU database was used. Among the 9 ML models tested, the categorical boosting (CatBoost) model demonstrated the best discriminative ability. After reducing features based on their importance, an explainable final CatBoost model was developed using 8 features. The final model accurately predicted sepsis in internal (AUC=0.812) and external (AUC=0.771) tests.
conclusionsWe constructed a web-based risk calculator with 8 features based on the CatBoost model to assist clinicians in identifying people at high risk for sepsis in patients with ICH who are critically ill.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.