Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40293793›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Identification and Validation of an Explainable Prediction Model of Sepsis in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Xianglin Liu, Zhihua Huang, Yizhi Guo, Yandeng Li, Jianming Zhu, Jun Wen, Yunchun Gao, Jianyi Liu

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Endometrial immune dysregulation shapes CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xianglin Liu *Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde City), Changde, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3342-0874
Zhihua Huang *Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde City), Changde, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0339-5460
Yizhi GuoChangde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde City), Changde, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5168-994X
Yandeng LiChangde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde City), Changde, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4555-0342
Jianming ZhuChangde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde City), Changde, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9503-3416
Jun WenChangde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde City), Changde, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7756-9501
Yunchun GaoChangde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde City), Changde, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6840-4218
Jianyi LiuChangde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde City), Changde, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2747-1623

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a life-threatening condition frequently observed in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) who are critically ill. Early and accurate identification and prediction of sepsis are crucial. Machine learning (ML)-based predictive models exhibit promising sepsis prediction capabilities in emergency settings. However, their application in predicting sepsis among patients with ICH is still limited.

objectiveThe aim of the study is to develop an ML-driven risk calculator for early prediction of sepsis in patients with ICH who are critically ill and to clarify feature importance and explain the model using the Shapley Additive Explanations method.

methodsPatients with ICH admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database between 2008 and 2022 were divided into training and internal test sets. The external test was performed using the eICU Collaborative Research Database, which includes over 200,000 ICU admissions across the United States between 2014 and 2015. Sepsis following ICU admission was identified using Sepsis-3.0 through clinical diagnosis combining elevation of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment by ≥2 points with suspected infection. The Boruta algorithm was used for feature selection, confirming 29 features. Nine ML algorithms were used to construct the prediction models. Predictive performance was compared using several evaluation metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The Shapley Additive Explanations technique was used to interpret the final model, and a web-based risk calculator was constructed for clinical practice.

resultsOverall, 2414 patients with ICH were enrolled from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database, with 1689 and 725 patients assigned to the training and internal test sets, respectively. An external test set of 2806 patients with ICH from the eICU database was used. Among the 9 ML models tested, the categorical boosting (CatBoost) model demonstrated the best discriminative ability. After reducing features based on their importance, an explainable final CatBoost model was developed using 8 features. The final model accurately predicted sepsis in internal (AUC=0.812) and external (AUC=0.771) tests.

conclusionsWe constructed a web-based risk calculator with 8 features based on the CatBoost model to assist clinicians in identifying people at high risk for sepsis in patients with ICH who are critically ill.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageSepsisAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC Curveintracerebral hemorrhagemachine learningprediction modelsepsisSHAPShapley Additive Explanations

Identifiers

PMID40293793
PMCPMC12070006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.