ArticleJMIR research protocols2025
Feasibility of Using Resting Heart Rate and Step Counts From Patient-Held Sensors During Clinical Assessment of Medical Emergencies (FUSE): Protocol for Prospective Observational Study in European Hospitals.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbnormalities of vital signs are quantified by comparison with normal ranges, which are those observed in resting healthy populations. It might be more appropriate to compare the vital sign values of an individual in distress with their own usual values recorded when they were stable and well. Sensors from smartwatches or smartphones might make this possible at scale, but the proportion of patients using them is not known.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the feasibility of using heart rate and mobility data from patients' own wearable sensors as part of clinical assessments at the time of presentation to hospitals with medical emergencies, and to quantify the difference between heart rate and the change in daily steps taken by the patient on admission to acute care compared with the previously recorded values at home.
methodsThis is an international, multicenter observational study using the flashmob research design. The study will recruit patients aged 18 years and older who present to emergency departments, acute medical departments, or ambulatory emergency care with an acute medical complaint. Main end points of the study include the proportion of patients assessed for an acute complaint who use wearable devices to record vital signs. The study will describe the population that uses devices that collect vital signs in terms of sex, age group, digital literacy, and the severity of illness on presentation (as measured by a standard set of vital signs and frailty). Trends in heart rate and step counts measured in the month before presentation to acute care services will be reported according to discharge or admission status. Data will be collected during a pilot phase and during a single week in centers across Europe.
resultsThe study has been registered and passed the required approvals in the Netherlands Medical Ethics Committee (MEC-2022-0795) and the United Kingdom Integrated Research Application System (IRAS 321129). Based on the results of a pilot study performed at a single site in the United Kingdom, a flashmob study has been concluded in hospitals throughout Europe in May 2024 and reported in 2025.
conclusionsWith the increasing availability of consumer held devices able to record medically relevant information this study will provide information about the availability of these data for clinical use in a number of European settings. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/55975.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.