Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40293749›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Psychological Distress Among US-Born and Non-US-Born Black or African American Adults in the US.

Maryam Elhabashy, David Adzrago, Faustine Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maryam ElhabashyDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, Maryland.
David AdzragoDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, Maryland.
Faustine WilliamsDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Limited research explores within-group and between-group differences in the prevalence of and factors associated with psychological distress among Black or African American adults, especially by nativity. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of moderate-to-severe (hereafter, moderate-severe) psychological distress and to assess factors associated with increased risk among Black or African American adults according to nativity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study drew data from the 2005 to 2018 National Health Interview Surveys. The study analyzed national household probability samples of the civilian noninstitutionalized Black or African American adult population aged 18 years or older, including US-born and non-US-born subgroups, between January to December 2005 and January to December 2018. Data analysis was performed from November 2023 to January 2025. Exposures: Birthplace (ie, US-born if born in the US; non-US-born if born outside the US, including US territories). Risk factors included sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and health behavior factors. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was moderate-severe psychological distress status based on self-reported responses to the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were reported as estimates to determine the computed associations across logistic regression models. Results: A total of 49 820 individuals (43 885 born in the US and 5935 born outside the US) were analyzed. Overall, 21.9% of the sample (11 079 individuals) experienced moderate-severe psychological distress, with a higher prevalence among US-born (10 037 individuals [22.6%]) than non-US-born (1042 individuals [17.4%]) individuals. Individuals aged 65 years or older (especially US-born; OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.44-0.58) and male individuals (especially non-US-born; OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56-0.82) had lower odds of experiencing moderate-severe psychological distress. Unemployment (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.80-2.03) and having less than a college education were associated with higher odds of moderate-severe psychological distress across the subgroups, especially among US-born individuals. Current and former smoking was associated with higher odds of moderate-severe psychological distress, with greater odds among non-US-born individuals than among US-born and overall Black or African American individuals. Current and former alcohol drinking was associated with higher odds among only the general population (current drinking, OR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.29-1.47]; former drinking, OR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.16-1.37]) and US-born individuals (current drinking, OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.36-1.56]; former drinking, OR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.19-1.41]), with higher ORs among US-born population. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of differences in moderate-severe psychological distress by nativity among Black or African American adults, more pronounced risks were observed among US-born individuals. Longitudinal studies and data disaggregation could further elucidate health differences to improve cultural competence and adaptability in mental health research and interventions.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanEmigrants and ImmigrantsPsychological DistressStress, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40293749
PMCPMC12038514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.