ArticleJAMA network open2025
Psychological Distress Among US-Born and Non-US-Born Black or African American Adults in the US.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing severe maternal morbidity and neonatal outcomes between Somali and non-Somali black birthing cohorts.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Stigma, Depression, and Social Support in Black Individuals Diagnosed with Schizophrenia.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- The Prevalence of Poor Behavioral Health Among University Students by Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Racial Identity: The Role of Discrimination and Microaggressions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Bridging the Crisis Gap: A Scoping Review of Psychological Distress and Help-Seeking Behaviors in Black Americans Using Crisis Hotlines.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Sex differences in psychological distress and its risk factors among US adult Black and White immigrants, NHIS 2005-2018.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Racial inequalities in access to healthcare services in Brazil (2019): a decomposition analysis.BMC health services research · 2025Observational
- Analysis of left ventricular mass for African American individuals using multi-ancestry polygenic risk scores: the Jackson Heart Study.Open heart · 2025Article
- Networks and clusters of immunometabolic biomarkers and depression-associated features in middle-aged and older community-dwelling US adults with and without depression.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Limited research explores within-group and between-group differences in the prevalence of and factors associated with psychological distress among Black or African American adults, especially by nativity. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of moderate-to-severe (hereafter, moderate-severe) psychological distress and to assess factors associated with increased risk among Black or African American adults according to nativity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study drew data from the 2005 to 2018 National Health Interview Surveys. The study analyzed national household probability samples of the civilian noninstitutionalized Black or African American adult population aged 18 years or older, including US-born and non-US-born subgroups, between January to December 2005 and January to December 2018. Data analysis was performed from November 2023 to January 2025. Exposures: Birthplace (ie, US-born if born in the US; non-US-born if born outside the US, including US territories). Risk factors included sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and health behavior factors. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was moderate-severe psychological distress status based on self-reported responses to the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were reported as estimates to determine the computed associations across logistic regression models. Results: A total of 49 820 individuals (43 885 born in the US and 5935 born outside the US) were analyzed. Overall, 21.9% of the sample (11 079 individuals) experienced moderate-severe psychological distress, with a higher prevalence among US-born (10 037 individuals [22.6%]) than non-US-born (1042 individuals [17.4%]) individuals. Individuals aged 65 years or older (especially US-born; OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.44-0.58) and male individuals (especially non-US-born; OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56-0.82) had lower odds of experiencing moderate-severe psychological distress. Unemployment (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.80-2.03) and having less than a college education were associated with higher odds of moderate-severe psychological distress across the subgroups, especially among US-born individuals. Current and former smoking was associated with higher odds of moderate-severe psychological distress, with greater odds among non-US-born individuals than among US-born and overall Black or African American individuals. Current and former alcohol drinking was associated with higher odds among only the general population (current drinking, OR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.29-1.47]; former drinking, OR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.16-1.37]) and US-born individuals (current drinking, OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.36-1.56]; former drinking, OR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.19-1.41]), with higher ORs among US-born population. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of differences in moderate-severe psychological distress by nativity among Black or African American adults, more pronounced risks were observed among US-born individuals. Longitudinal studies and data disaggregation could further elucidate health differences to improve cultural competence and adaptability in mental health research and interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.