Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40293747›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Barriers and Opportunities for Cancer Clinical Trials in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Linsey Eldridge, Nina R Goodman, Amina Chtourou, Annette Galassi, Cecilia Monge, Mishka Kohli Cira, Paul C Pearlman, Patrick J Loehrer, Satish Gopal, Ophira Ginsburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Does One Size Fit All? Commentary on the HYPNO Trial.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Linsey EldridgeCenter for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Nina R GoodmanOffice of Communications and Public Liaison, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Amina ChtourouCenter for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Annette GalassiLeidos Biomedical Research, Inc, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Cecilia MongeCenter for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Mishka Kohli CiraCenter for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Paul C PearlmanCenter for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Patrick J LoehrerIndiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis.
Satish GopalCenter for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Ophira GinsburgCenter for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Clinical trials represent the gold standard to test the safety and efficacy of new or updated approaches to treatments that will inform quality cancer care. However, cancer trials enroll few patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), are often led by investigators from high-income countries, and do not adequately reflect global disease burden or population diversity. Objective: To identify key challenges and strategies to advance contextually relevant, quality cancer trials in LMICs. Design, Setting, and Participants: The survey used in this survey study was available in English, Arabic, French, Portuguese, and Spanish and was conducted by the US National Cancer Institute from October 18 to December 22, 2023. Clinicians with experience in cancer therapeutic clinical trials in LMICs were eligible. The survey covered their professional background and views on challenges and strategies for improving clinical trial opportunities in LMICs. Analysis was performed from April 2 to August 26, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Respondents were asked to rate 34 challenges by impact on their ability to conduct cancer trials using a 4-point Likert scale and 8 strategies by importance using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics summarized participants' backgrounds, challenges, and priorities. Results: Of 453 respondents who began the survey, a total of 223 (49%) were eligible for inclusion, and 131 of those (59%) completed the survey in full. Among the 133 respondents who provided gender data, 81 (61%) were male. In all, 107 of 130 respondents (82%) were affiliated with LMIC institutions, 65 of 223 (29%) were medical oncologists, and 52 of 133 (39%) were midcareer. Financial challenges were rated as the most impactful, with 133 of 170 respondents (78%) rating difficulty obtaining funding for investigator-initiated trials as having a large impact on ability to carry out a trial. Human capacity issues followed, with 105 of 192 respondents (55%) rating lack of dedicated research time as having a large impact. Increasing opportunities for funding and improving human capacity were reported as key strategies to advance capacity to conduct clinical trials in LMICs. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study of clinicians with clinical trial experience in LMICs suggests that adequate funding and a well-trained research workforce are 2 predominant challenges to advancing cancer therapeutic clinical trials in LMICs. Understanding these obstacles can inform efforts to support cancer clinical trials that better reflect worldwide needs and diversity by prioritizing and sustaining research led by LMIC investigators.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDeveloping CountriesNeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40293747
PMCPMC12038506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.