Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40293679›Full record

ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2025

Sustaining Ophthalmic Practices for the Future: A High-Value Care Approach to Environmental Responsibility.

Yee Ling Wong, Tariq M Aslam, David F Chang, Barbara Erny

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yee Ling WongManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. yeelingwong@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6109-8836
Tariq M AslamManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
David F ChangAltos Eye Physicians, Los Altos, CA, USA.
Barbara ErnyStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ophthalmology, like all medical specialities, is continuously evolving to adapt to emerging challenges and advancements. The evidence-based medical practices that previously guided policies and regulations may no longer be sufficient or sustainable in the context of an ageing population, increasing healthcare demands, and the urgent need for sustainability. As the global burden on healthcare systems grows, sustainability must be considered from multiple perspectives, including financial and environmental aspects, without compromising patient outcomes. While financial sustainability is essential to ensure cost-effective resource allocation, accessibility, and affordability for both healthcare providers and patients, environmental sustainability is becoming an increasing priority. Efforts to minimise the carbon footprint associated with medical procedures, transportation, and the production and disposal of ophthalmic equipment and materials are necessary. This paper highlights key examples of areas within ophthalmology where sustainability can be enhanced by practicing high-value care. We describe targeted opportunities that demonstrate how sustainable practices can be successfully integrated into ophthalmology without compromising patient care or operational feasibility.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceEfficient healthcareHigh value careOphthalmology greenhouse gasesSustainability

Identifiers

PMID40293679
PMCPMC12069770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.