Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40293641›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025

Comparative efficacy and safety of alternatives to sodium valproate in the management of bipolar affective disorder in people of child-bearing age: a narrative review by the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy's mental health specialist interest group.

Ita Fitzgerald, Izgi Bayraktar, Birgit Eiden, Rosalind Gittins, Erica Magni, Marie Humbert-Claude, Lara-Turiya Molitschnig, Paula Darm, Anna Waksmundzka-Walczuk, Nikolaus Riesenhuber and 3 more

Abstract readReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ita FitzgeraldPharmacy Department, St Patrick's Mental Health Services, St Patrick's University Hospital, Dublin 8, D08K7YW, Ireland. ifitzgerald@stpatricks.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9570-8823
Izgi BayraktarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Birgit EidenPharmacy Department, Rheinhessen, Fachklinik Alzey, Alzey, Germany.
Rosalind GittinsAston School of Pharmacy, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Erica MagniPharmacy Department, ASP IMMeS e PAT, Milan, Italy.
Marie Humbert-ClaudePharmacy of the Eastern Vaud Hospitals, Route du Vieux Séquoia 20, 1847, Rennaz, Switzerland.
Lara-Turiya MolitschnigPharmacy Department, Hospital of the Elisabethians Graz, Graz, Austria.
Paula DarmDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt-Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Anna Waksmundzka-WalczukDistrict Health Care Institute, Starachowice Hospital, Starachowice, Poland.
Nikolaus RiesenhuberPharmacy Department, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Matej StuhecFaculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Ivana TaškováPsychiatric Hospital Bohnice, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martina HahnDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt-Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe European Medicines Agency has recommended a series of restrictions on the use of sodium valproate (valproate) following research linking its exposure in utero to adverse congenital and neurodevelopmental effects in offspring. Recent research has highlighted a potential increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in children born to males taking valproate prior to conception. Clinicians and patients require guidance regarding suitable alternatives.

aimTo provide an overview of suitable alternatives to valproate in the management of bipolar disorder.

methodA narrative review was conducted. Only medications with an established evidence base in managing different phases of bipolar disorder and endorsed within clinical practice guidelines were considered. Eligible guidelines included those (i) where recommendations were informed by a formal guideline development process and (ii) published in English within the last 15 years. REPROTOX® was chosen as the primary information source regarding reproductive safety of alternative medications.

resultsOf all second-generation antipsychotics, quetiapine should be considered a first-line alternative to valproate. Lithium has been associated with an increased risk of cardiac malformations, especially Ebstein anomaly, following in utero exposure. However, given its robust efficacy as an antimanic agent and the absolute risk of cardiac abnormalities being low, it's use can still be considered in individuals of child-bearing potential with appropriate monitoring. Carbamazepine treatment should be avoided due to concerns for teratogenicity. Although considered safe in pregnancy, lamotrigine is largely effective at preventing relapse of bipolar depression. Thus, lamotrigine offers limited clinical utility as an alternative to valproate.

conclusionSpecific recommendations are made regarding alternatives to valproate in managing bipolar disorder.

Indexed as

Antimanic AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsBipolar DisorderDisease ManagementValproic AcidEuropeFemaleHumansPregnancyTreatment OutcomeAntimanic AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsValproic AcidBipolar affective disorderBipolar disorderMood stabilisersNarrative reviewPregnancySodium valproateTeratogenicity

Identifiers

PMID40293641
PMCPMC12125100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.