Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40293527›Full record

ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Proximal humerus fracture: old and new, established and doubtful, conservative and operative aspects].

Pierre Hepp, Ralf Henkelmann, Maria Elze, Jan Theopold

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pierre HeppKlinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie, Bereich für arthroskopische und spezielle Gelenkchirurgie, Sportverletzungen, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. Pierre.Hepp@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Ralf HenkelmannKlinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie, Bereich für arthroskopische und spezielle Gelenkchirurgie, Sportverletzungen, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Maria ElzeKlinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie, Bereich für arthroskopische und spezielle Gelenkchirurgie, Sportverletzungen, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Jan TheopoldKlinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie, Bereich für arthroskopische und spezielle Gelenkchirurgie, Sportverletzungen, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proximal humeral fractures are not only frequent injuries but also serve as an important indicator for a possibly underlying osteoporosis. Therefore, in addition to fracture management, timely diagnostics and treatment of the osteoporosis should also be prioritized. The decision between a conservative and surgical treatment approach requires a differentiated consideration of the fracture morphology, individual patient characteristics and functional expectations. Conservative treatment can be an adequate alternative in specific cases, particularly in geriatric patients with low functional demands; however, the standardization of this treatment approach remains challenging. Surgical interventions have proven effective, especially for complex fractures, with reverse shoulder arthroplasty emerging as a reliable option. Various augmentation and fixation techniques, such as the combination of locking plates with fibular grafts or double plating osteosynthesis, demonstrate biomechanical advantages and can improve the primary stability. Innovative technologies, including 3D planning, intraoperative navigation and robotics, offer new possibilities for optimizing implant placement and can contribute to improvement of long-term clinical outcomes. Economic analyses suggest that reverse arthroplasty can provide not only clinical benefits in selected cases but can also be cost-effective; however, further evaluation of the long-term impact on the healthcare system is required.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentFracture Fixation, InternalShoulder FracturesAgedBone PlatesHumans3D planning and navigationConservative treatmentFracture osteosynthesisOsteoporosisReverse shoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.