ArticleRheumatology international2025
Favorable outcomes for patients with refractory systemic lupus erythematosus treated with rituximab as evidenced with a follow-up of ≥ 10 years: a real-world evidence study.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Rituximab as Rescue or Add-On Therapy for Relapsing or Refractory Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and translational science · 2026Pooled it
- Combined rituximab and magnesium acetyl taurate therapy attenuates neurodegeneration via ERK/c-JNK/P38MAPK signaling modulation in methylmercury-induced amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-like neurotoxicity.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- A bibliometric analysis on immunotherapy treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus: analysis of published evidence from 2014 to 2024.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) remains challenging. The aim of this real-world evidence study of patients with refractory SLE treated with rituximab (RTX) was to explore for any potential long-term effect(s) of this particular B cell depletion approach. This study included patients with SLE who had i) received at least 1 cycle of RTX and had ii) an at least 10 yr of follow-up after their first RTX infusion. Outcomes were assessed at 1 year and at their latest evaluation that was ≥ 10 yr after RTX treatment initiation. In cases where the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (cSLEDAI-2 k) was employed, a response was defined as a cSLEDAI-2 k of less than 4 in cases where the cSLEDAI-2 k was ≥ 4. In cases where the cSLEDAI-2 k was 2-4 at baseline, a response was defined as a cSLEDAI-2 k of 0. RTX was administered in 62 patients with SLE. For this real-world evidence study 23 patients (25 cases) with SLE (all Caucasian female, age range: 14-72 yr, mean: 31 yr) with active or relapsing disease, fulfilling inclusion criteria were enrolled. RTX treatment was associated with a response rate of 68.75% after 1 yr and 75% after ≥ 10 yr. The median cSLEDAI-2 K score decreased from 5.83 ± 3.70 at baseline to 1.95 ± 2.40 (p < 0.001) at 1 yr and to 2.37 ± 3.00 (p < 0.001) at the ≥ 10 yr time-point of follow-up. Our data suggest that RTX may indeed represent an alternative therapeutic option in patients with SLE refractory to standard treatment with an acceptable safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.