Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40293520›Full record

SynthesisAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

MRI radiomics prediction modelling for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jason Rai, Dinh V C Mai, Ioanna Drami, Edward T Pring, Laura E Gould, Phillip F C Lung, Thomas Glover, Joshua D Shur, Brandon Whitcher, Thanos Athanasiou and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Clinical target volume radiomics from planning CT for pretreatment response prediction  in rectal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jason RaiBiCyCLE Research Group, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital, London, UK. jason.rai@nhs.net.
Dinh V C MaiBiCyCLE Research Group, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital, London, UK.
Ioanna DramiBiCyCLE Research Group, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital, London, UK.
Edward T PringBiCyCLE Research Group, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital, London, UK.
Laura E GouldBiCyCLE Research Group, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital, London, UK.
Phillip F C LungBiCyCLE Research Group, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital, London, UK.
Thomas GloverBiCyCLE Research Group, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital, London, UK.
Joshua D ShurDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Brandon WhitcherDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Thanos AthanasiouBiCyCLE Research Group, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital, London, UK.
John T JenkinsBiCyCLE Research Group, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePredicting response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is challenging. Organ preservation strategies can be offered to patients with complete clinical response. We aim to evaluate MRI-derived radiomics models in predicting complete pathological response (pCR).

methodsSearch included MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) for studies published before 1st February 2024. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) and Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) tools were used to assess quality of included study. The research protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024512865). We calculated pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) using a random-effects model. To compare AUC between subgroups the Hanley & McNeil test was performed.

resultsForty-four eligible studies (12,714 patients) were identified for inclusion in the systematic review. We selected thirty-five studies including 10,543 patients for meta-analysis. The pooled AUC for MRI radiomics predicted pCR in LARC was 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.89). In the subgroup analysis 3 T MRI field intensity had higher pooled AUC 0.9 (95% CI 0.87-0.94) than 1.5 T pooled AUC 0.82 (95% CI 0.80-0.83) p < 0.001. Asian ethnicity had higher pooled AUC 0.9 (95% CI 0.87-0.93) than non-Asian pooled AUC 0.8 (95% CI 0.75-0.84) p < 0.001.

conclusionWe have demonstrated that 3 T MRI field intensity provides a superior predictive performance. The role of ethnicity on radiomics features needs to be explored in future studies. Further research in the field of MRI radiomics is important as accurate prediction for pCR can lead to organ preservation strategy in LARC.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsHumansRadiomicsMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant treatmentPathological responseRadiomicsRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID40293520
PMCPMC12568919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.