Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40293507›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2025

A Machine Learning Pipeline for Automated Bolus Segmentation and Area Measurement in Swallowing Videofluoroscopy Images of an Infant Pig Model.

Max Sarmet, Elska Kaczmarek, Alexane Fauveau, Kendall Steer, Alex-Ann Velasco, Ani Smith, Maressa Kennedy, Hannah Shideler, Skyler Wallace, Thomas Stroud and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Max SarmetDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA. Maxsarmet@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3029-8912
Elska KaczmarekDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Alexane FauveauDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Kendall SteerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Alex-Ann VelascoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Ani SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Maressa KennedyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Hannah ShidelerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Skyler WallaceDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Thomas StroudDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Morgan BlilieDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Christopher J MayerlDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.

Funding

The impact of biomimetic nipple on infant feeding functionR00HD105922 · NICHD · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI MAYERL, CHRISTOPHER · 2022 to 2024
$720k
The impact of a biomimetic nipple on infant performance during breast and bottle feedingR21HD105294 · NICHD · NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI GERMAN, REBECCA Z · 2022 to 2023
$429k
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health R00 HD205922NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD105922NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD105294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feeding efficiency and safety are often driven by bolus volume, which is one of the most common clinical measures of assessing swallow performance. However, manual measurement of bolus area is time-consuming and suffers from high levels of inter-rater variability. This study proposes a machine learning (ML) pipeline using ilastik, an accessible bioimage analysis tool, to automate the measurement of bolus area during swallowing. The pipeline was tested on 336 swallows from videofluoroscopic recordings of 8 infant pigs during bottle feeding. Eight trained raters manually measured bolus area in ImageJ and also used ilastik's autocontext pixel-level labeling and object classification tools to train ML models for automated bolus segmentation and area calculation. The ML pipeline trained in 1h42min and processed the dataset in 2 min 48s, a 97% time saving compared to manual methods. The model exhibited strong performance, achieving a high Dice Similarity Coefficient (0.84), Intersection over Union (0.76), and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.79). The bolus areas from the two methods were highly correlated (R² = 0.74 overall, 0.78 without bubbles, 0.67 with bubbles), with no significant difference in measured bolus area between the methods. Our ML pipeline, requiring no ML expertise, offers a reliable and efficient method for automatically measuring bolus area. While human confirmation remains valuable, this pipeline accelerates analysis and improves reproducibility compared to manual methods. Future refinements can further enhance precision and broaden its application in dysphagia research.

Indexed as

DeglutitionDeglutition DisordersMachine LearningAnimalsFluoroscopyModels, AnimalReproducibility of ResultsSwineVideo RecordingAnimal modelsArtificial intelligenceDysphagiaMachine learningSwallowingVideofluoroscopy

Identifiers

PMID40293507
PMCPMC12354037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.