ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[Potential of bacteriophage therapy in Germany: evidence and clinical relevance].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Bacteriophage Science: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Applications, Challenges, and Translational Opportunities.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Is a Bacteriophage Approach for Musculoskeletal Infection Management an Alternative to Conventional Therapy?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacteriophage therapy (phage therapy) holds great potential in addressing the growing threat of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Registry studies and systematic reviews indicate that phage treatments are effective in approximately 80-90% of antibiotic-resistant infections across various indications. In principle, the approximately 62,000 annual cases of infections caused by resistant or difficult-to-treat pathogens in Germany could be treated with phage therapy. Currently, several clinical trials are underway to assess the safety and efficacy of phage therapy for specific indications; however, no product has yet undergone a formal approval process. Furthermore, the timely applicability of phage therapy for individual cases is constrained by high production costs, limited capacities, and regulatory hurdles. The first market approvals in the USA and Europe are expected within the next three to five years, which could significantly strengthen the outlook for phage therapy. Concrete steps to accelerate the implementation of phage therapy in Germany to relieve the healthcare system include establishing a dedicated phage manufacturing facility, reducing regulatory barriers for compassionate use, promoting innovative technologies for production and diagnostics, and supporting clinical approval studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.