Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40293490›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025

[Potential of bacteriophage therapy in Germany: evidence and clinical relevance].

Felix Bröcker, Christian Willy

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Felix BröckerIdorsia (Berlin) Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Magnusstr. 11, 12489, Berlin, Deutschland. felixbroecker@gmx.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7373-9760
Christian WillyKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Septisch-Rekonstruktive Chirurgie, Forschungs- und Behandlungszentrum Rekonstruktion von Defektwunden, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Berlin, Scharnhorststraße 13, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9604-3384

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophage therapy (phage therapy) holds great potential in addressing the growing threat of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Registry studies and systematic reviews indicate that phage treatments are effective in approximately 80-90% of antibiotic-resistant infections across various indications. In principle, the approximately 62,000 annual cases of infections caused by resistant or difficult-to-treat pathogens in Germany could be treated with phage therapy. Currently, several clinical trials are underway to assess the safety and efficacy of phage therapy for specific indications; however, no product has yet undergone a formal approval process. Furthermore, the timely applicability of phage therapy for individual cases is constrained by high production costs, limited capacities, and regulatory hurdles. The first market approvals in the USA and Europe are expected within the next three to five years, which could significantly strengthen the outlook for phage therapy. Concrete steps to accelerate the implementation of phage therapy in Germany to relieve the healthcare system include establishing a dedicated phage manufacturing facility, reducing regulatory barriers for compassionate use, promoting innovative technologies for production and diagnostics, and supporting clinical approval studies.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsEvidence-Based MedicinePhage TherapyClinical RelevanceGermanyHumansTreatment OutcomeAntibiotic resistanceCase studiesClinical trialsMultidrug resistancePhage therapy

Identifiers

PMID40293490
PMCPMC12130139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.