ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Combination of pre-transplant flow cytometry, WT1 expression, and NGS for MRD monitoring is potent in predicting the prognosis of AML receiving allogeneic transplantation.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring has been demonstrated to important in predicting prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), but the ideal time point and method remain unclear. Our study compared the prognostic value of multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC)-based and WT1 expression-based MRD a month before allo-HSCT [HSCT(-1 m)] and after allo-HSCT [HSCT(+ 1 m)], as well as next generation sequencing (NGS)-based MRD at HSCT(-1 m), HSCT(+ 1 m), 3 and 6 months after allo-HSCT [HSCT(+ 3 m) and HSCT(+ 6 m)] among 47 AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT. The MRD status by all the methods at HSCT(-1 m) was proved as a superior indicator with prognostic significance for disease progression, compared to that at HSCT(+ 1 m). For the NGS-based MRD, HSCT(+ 6 m) seemed to be the optimal detection time point, as supported by the optimal prognostic discrimination capability and the relatively high sensitivity for disease progression prediction. Moreover, our data showed that each individual method had some limitations in predicting prognosis; however, pre-transplant MRD monitoring by the combination of MFC, WT1 and NGS could greatly increase the sensitivity (100%) of identifying disease progression and greatly improve prognostic stratification. Our study may provide insights into the optimal time point and methodology for MRD monitoring in AML following allo-HSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.