Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40293445›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2025

Molecular and Morphological Circuitry of the Octopus Sucker Ganglion.

Cassady S Olson, Aashna Moorjani, Clifton W Ragsdale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multiple longitudinal tracts in the cephalopod arm sensorimotor system.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cassady S OlsonCommittee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8587-115X
Aashna MoorjaniDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Clifton W RagsdaleDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1289-1440

Funding

Circuit dynamics of sensorimotor integration and decision making in octopusUF1NS115817 · NINDS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PELLED, GALIT · 2020 to 2020
$2.3M
NIH HHS UF1NS115817NINDS NIH HHS UF1 NS115817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The octopus sucker is a profoundly complex sensorimotor structure. Each of the hundreds of suckers that line the octopus arm can move independently or in concert with one another. These suckers also contain an intricate sensory epithelium, enriched with chemotactile receptors. Much of the massive nervous system embedded in the octopus arm mediates control of the suckers. Each arm houses a large axial nerve cord (ANC), which features local enlargements corresponding to each sucker. There is also a sucker ganglion, a peripheral nervous element, situated in the stalk of every sucker. The structure and function of the sucker ganglion remain obscure. We examined the cellular organization and molecular composition of the sucker ganglion in Octopus bimaculoides. The sucker ganglion has an ellipsoid shape and features an unusual organization: the neuropil of the ganglion is distributed as a cap aborally (away from the sucker) and a small pocket orally (toward the sucker), with neuronal cell bodies concentrated in the space between. Using in situ hybridization, we detected positive expression of sensory (PIEZO) and motor (LHX3 and MNX) neuron markers in the sucker ganglion cell bodies. Nerve fibers spread out from the sucker ganglion, targeting the surrounding sucker musculature and the oral roots extending to the ANC. Our results indicate that the sucker ganglion is composed of both sensory and motor elements and suggest that this ganglion is not a simple relay for the ANC, but facilitates local reflexes for each sucker.

Indexed as

Ganglia, InvertebrateOctopodiformesAnimalsIn Situ Hybridizationcephalopodinvertebratemuscular hydrostatneural circuitryneuroethologyOctopus bimaculoidessensorimotor control

Identifiers

PMID40293445
PMCPMC12036646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.