Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40293419›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2025

Development and Testing of the Protocol Quality Rating Tool (PQRT) to Evaluate Clinical Trial Protocol Document Quality.

Angela K Lyden, Claire Z Kalpakjian, Cathie Spino, Susan L Murphy, Julie C Lumeng, Anna S Lok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angela K LydenMichigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0964-1667
Claire Z KalpakjianMichigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6652-1245
Cathie SpinoMichigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6157-6738
Susan L MurphyMichigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7924-0012
Julie C LumengMichigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7898-8210
Anna S LokMichigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5811-6845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A high-quality protocol document is essential for the successful and efficient implementation of clinical trials, but there is no consensus on how clinical trial protocol document quality should be evaluated. We used a modified Delphi approach and cognitive interviews to develop a new protocol document quality assessment tool, the Protocol Quality Rating Tool (PQRT). We compiled a checklist of elements that should be included in a high-quality trial protocol document and asked experts to rate the importance of each element. We developed the PQRT by describing the expected content of each element and identified essential vs. additional (bonus) content to differentiate high- versus low-quality protocol documents and then organized the elements into 18 sections. We revised the PQRT based on feedback from and cognitive interviews with our protocol quality rating team. We then tested the PQRT using ten protocol documents previously approved by the Institutional Review Board. All the protocol quality raters found the tool easy to use and their scores were highly concordant for eight of ten protocol documents. We have developed and tested a simple tool to measure clinical trial protocol document quality and encourage other researchers to evaluate and validate it.

Indexed as

Clinical Trial Protocols as TopicClinical Trials as TopicChecklistDelphi TechniqueHumansQuality Controlclinical trial protocol checklistclinical trialscognitive interviewprotocol document qualityquality rating tool

Identifiers

PMID40293419
PMCPMC12036343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.